PortfoliosLab logo
MNST vs. LULU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MNST and LULU is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

MNST vs. LULU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%1,600.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1,613.56%
866.57%
MNST
LULU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MNST:

0.37

LULU:

-0.58

Sortino Ratio

MNST:

0.64

LULU:

-0.63

Omega Ratio

MNST:

1.09

LULU:

0.92

Calmar Ratio

MNST:

0.36

LULU:

-0.46

Martin Ratio

MNST:

1.09

LULU:

-1.22

Ulcer Index

MNST:

8.54%

LULU:

20.73%

Daily Std Dev

MNST:

25.54%

LULU:

43.43%

Max Drawdown

MNST:

-69.17%

LULU:

-92.24%

Current Drawdown

MNST:

-3.71%

LULU:

-47.07%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MNST:

$57.02B

LULU:

$31.57B

EPS

MNST:

$1.49

LULU:

$14.86

PE Ratio

MNST:

39.32

LULU:

17.89

PEG Ratio

MNST:

2.11

LULU:

1.08

PS Ratio

MNST:

7.61

LULU:

2.98

PB Ratio

MNST:

9.65

LULU:

7.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

MNST:

$5.59B

LULU:

$10.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MNST:

$3.02B

LULU:

$6.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

MNST:

$1.46B

LULU:

$2.84B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -29.23% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has underperformed LULU with an annualized return of 9.40%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.


MNST

YTD

11.47%

1M

1.30%

6M

9.64%

1Y

7.84%

5Y*

14.45%

10Y*

9.40%

LULU

YTD

-29.23%

1M

-19.77%

6M

-9.48%

1Y

-25.77%

5Y*

4.77%

10Y*

15.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MNST vs. LULU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNST is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNST is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNST is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNST is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNST is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNST is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

LULU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LULU is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LULU is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LULU is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LULU is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LULU is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LULU is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MNST vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for MNST, currently valued at 0.37, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
MNST: 0.37
LULU: -0.58
The chart of Sortino ratio for MNST, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
MNST: 0.64
LULU: -0.63
The chart of Omega ratio for MNST, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
MNST: 1.09
LULU: 0.92
The chart of Calmar ratio for MNST, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
MNST: 0.36
LULU: -0.46
The chart of Martin ratio for MNST, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
MNST: 1.09
LULU: -1.22

The current MNST Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNST and LULU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.40NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.37
-0.58
MNST
LULU

Dividends

MNST vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison

Neither MNST nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MNST vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-3.71%
-47.07%
MNST
LULU

Volatility

MNST vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 9.27%, while Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a volatility of 24.17%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.27%
24.17%
MNST
LULU

Financials

MNST vs. LULU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items