MNST vs. LULU

In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -33.15% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has underperformed LULU with an annualized return of 10.04%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively higher 14.81% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MNST Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNST and LULU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither MNST nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 4.39%, while Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a volatility of 20.22%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.