PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MNST vs. LULU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

MNST vs. LULU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%1,600.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1,420.82%
1,042.89%
MNST
LULU

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a -9.74% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -37.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has underperformed LULU with an annualized return of 11.04%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively higher 21.78% annualized return.


MNST

YTD

-9.74%

1M

-2.95%

6M

-3.90%

1Y

-5.63%

5Y (annualized)

12.16%

10Y (annualized)

11.04%

LULU

YTD

-37.41%

1M

8.77%

6M

-4.46%

1Y

-23.86%

5Y (annualized)

8.20%

10Y (annualized)

21.78%

Fundamentals


MNSTLULU
Market Cap$54.48B$39.40B
EPS$1.56$12.93
PE Ratio35.9124.82
PEG Ratio1.671.56
Total Revenue (TTM)$8.29B$7.79B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.98B$4.59B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.00B$2.28B

Key characteristics


MNSTLULU
Sharpe Ratio-0.27-0.73
Sortino Ratio-0.20-0.84
Omega Ratio0.970.88
Calmar Ratio-0.24-0.48
Martin Ratio-0.48-0.76
Ulcer Index12.80%34.10%
Daily Std Dev23.26%35.50%
Max Drawdown-69.17%-92.24%
Current Drawdown-14.54%-37.41%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between MNST and LULU is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MNST vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.27-0.73
The chart of Sortino ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.20-0.84
The chart of Omega ratio for MNST, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.970.88
The chart of Calmar ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.24-0.48
The chart of Martin ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.48, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.48-0.76
MNST
LULU

The current MNST Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is higher than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNST and LULU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.27
-0.73
MNST
LULU

Dividends

MNST vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison

Neither MNST nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MNST vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-14.54%
-37.41%
MNST
LULU

Volatility

MNST vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 9.16%, while Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a volatility of 10.96%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.16%
10.96%
MNST
LULU

Financials

MNST vs. LULU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items