PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MNST vs. ENSG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MNSTENSG
YTD Return-7.33%3.92%
1Y Return-8.52%24.62%
3Y Return (Ann)3.04%10.35%
5Y Return (Ann)11.11%19.77%
10Y Return (Ann)17.05%27.85%
Sharpe Ratio-0.341.09
Daily Std Dev21.09%21.01%
Max Drawdown-96.53%-55.57%
Current Drawdown-12.26%-7.45%

Fundamentals


MNSTENSG
Market Cap$55.89B$6.67B
EPS$1.54$3.65
PE Ratio34.6632.12
PEG Ratio1.881.48
Revenue (TTM)$7.14B$3.73B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.17B$534.92M
EBITDA (TTM)$2.08B$326.55M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between MNST and ENSG is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MNST vs. ENSG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a -7.33% return, which is significantly lower than ENSG's 3.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has underperformed ENSG with an annualized return of 17.05%, while ENSG has yielded a comparatively higher 27.85% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%3,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,278.98%
3,052.56%
MNST
ENSG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Monster Beverage Corporation

The Ensign Group, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MNST vs. ENSG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNST
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.34, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.34
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.36
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MNST, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.96
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.35
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.93, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.93
ENSG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ENSG, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ENSG, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ENSG, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ENSG, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.69
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ENSG, currently valued at 5.82, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.005.82

MNST vs. ENSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNST Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the ENSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MNST and ENSG.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.34
1.09
MNST
ENSG

Dividends

MNST vs. ENSG - Dividend Comparison

MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ENSG
The Ensign Group, Inc.
0.20%0.21%0.24%0.25%0.28%0.37%0.42%0.70%0.66%0.90%0.51%0.54%

Drawdowns

MNST vs. ENSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -96.53%, which is greater than ENSG's maximum drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and ENSG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-12.26%
-7.45%
MNST
ENSG

Volatility

MNST vs. ENSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 4.62%, while The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4.62%
5.77%
MNST
ENSG

Financials

MNST vs. ENSG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and The Ensign Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items