MNST vs. GS
Compare and contrast key facts about Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MNST or GS.
Correlation
The correlation between MNST and GS is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MNST vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MNST:
-0.21
GS:
2.09
MNST:
-0.12
GS:
3.04
MNST:
0.98
GS:
1.40
MNST:
-0.19
GS:
5.45
MNST:
-0.36
GS:
19.41
MNST:
13.37%
GS:
2.76%
MNST:
23.39%
GS:
25.66%
MNST:
-69.17%
GS:
-78.84%
MNST:
-15.00%
GS:
-6.52%
Fundamentals
MNST:
$50.52B
GS:
$180.40B
MNST:
$1.56
GS:
$34.12
MNST:
33.30
GS:
16.84
MNST:
1.63
GS:
3.95
MNST:
$7.41B
GS:
$50.96B
MNST:
$3.98B
GS:
$33.41B
MNST:
$2.02B
GS:
$18.07B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a -10.22% return, which is significantly lower than GS's 50.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 10.75%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.
MNST
-10.22%
-3.69%
5.36%
-6.61%
10.12%
10.75%
GS
50.30%
-2.24%
27.12%
52.35%
22.86%
13.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MNST vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MNST vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 2.03% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.16% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
MNST vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, smaller than the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and GS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MNST vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 5.07%, while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MNST vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities