MNST vs. GS
Compare and contrast key facts about Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).
Performance
MNST vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNST vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | -5.49% | 45.87% | -8.77% | 13.48% | 5.72% | 3.85% | 45.52% | 29.11% | -22.23% | 42.74% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | -3.25% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 40.48% | -33.53% | 7.73% |
Fundamentals
MNST:
$71.50B
GS:
$268.69B
MNST:
$1.93
GS:
$54.19
MNST:
37.47
GS:
15.61
MNST:
7.94
GS:
2.02
MNST:
8.61
GS:
2.14
MNST:
8.66
GS:
2.15
MNST:
$8.29B
GS:
$125.10B
MNST:
$4.63B
GS:
$57.17B
MNST:
$2.51B
GS:
$21.81B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a -5.49% return, which is significantly lower than GS's -3.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 12.42%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 20.59% annualized return.
MNST
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -15.05%
- YTD
- -5.49%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
GS
- 1D
- 4.75%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- -3.25%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- 58.07%
- 3Y*
- 40.67%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 20.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNST vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank
MNST
GS
MNST vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNST | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 1.82 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 2.35 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.33 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 3.04 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.21 | 9.70 | -4.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNST | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 1.82 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.87 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.70 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.31 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNST and GS is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MNST vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.83% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
Drawdowns
MNST vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, smaller than the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and GS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNST | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.17% | -78.84% | +9.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -19.42% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | -32.84% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.42% | -48.75% | +18.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.39% | -12.85% | -3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.76% | -22.75% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 6.08% | -1.24% |
Volatility
MNST vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 6.66%, while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a volatility of 9.44%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNST | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 9.44% | -2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.11% | 21.70% | -5.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.11% | 32.11% | -9.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.76% | 27.68% | -3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.17% | 29.71% | -3.54% |
Financials
MNST vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MNST vs. GS - Profitability Comparison
MNST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.5%.
GS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.35B and revenue of 30.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.
MNST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 542.63M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.5%.
GS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.63B and revenue of 30.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
MNST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 449.19M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in a net margin of 21.1%.
GS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 4.62B and revenue of 30.13B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.