PortfoliosLab logo
MNST vs. CELH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MNST and CELH is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MNST vs. CELH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MNST:

0.42

CELH:

-0.82

Sortino Ratio

MNST:

0.82

CELH:

-1.14

Omega Ratio

MNST:

1.12

CELH:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

MNST:

0.50

CELH:

-0.66

Martin Ratio

MNST:

1.52

CELH:

-0.84

Ulcer Index

MNST:

8.54%

CELH:

61.68%

Daily Std Dev

MNST:

25.37%

CELH:

67.28%

Max Drawdown

MNST:

-69.17%

CELH:

-99.79%

Current Drawdown

MNST:

0.00%

CELH:

-61.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MNST:

$59.83B

CELH:

$9.48B

EPS

MNST:

$1.52

CELH:

$0.33

PE Ratio

MNST:

40.37

CELH:

111.42

PEG Ratio

MNST:

2.17

CELH:

1.09

PS Ratio

MNST:

8.03

CELH:

7.13

PB Ratio

MNST:

9.12

CELH:

20.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

MNST:

$7.45B

CELH:

$1.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MNST:

$4.07B

CELH:

$670.37M

EBITDA (TTM)

MNST:

$2.02B

CELH:

$130.61M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a 16.74% return, which is significantly lower than CELH's 41.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has underperformed CELH with an annualized return of 10.81%, while CELH has yielded a comparatively higher 44.57% annualized return.


MNST

YTD

16.74%

1M

5.52%

6M

10.08%

1Y

10.64%

5Y*

13.55%

10Y*

10.81%

CELH

YTD

41.69%

1M

0.08%

6M

36.25%

1Y

-54.93%

5Y*

79.97%

10Y*

44.57%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MNST vs. CELH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNST is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNST is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNST is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNST is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNST is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNST is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

CELH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CELH is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CELH is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CELH is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CELH is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CELH is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CELH is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MNST vs. CELH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MNST Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is higher than the CELH Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNST and CELH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MNST vs. CELH - Dividend Comparison

Neither MNST nor CELH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MNST vs. CELH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, smaller than the maximum CELH drawdown of -99.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and CELH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MNST vs. CELH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 4.67%, while Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) has a volatility of 10.38%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CELH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MNST vs. CELH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and Celsius Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
1.85B
329.28M
(MNST) Total Revenue
(CELH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MNST vs. CELH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Monster Beverage Corporation and Celsius Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
56.5%
52.4%
(MNST) Gross Margin
(CELH) Gross Margin
MNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.05B and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.5%.

CELH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 172.37M and revenue of 329.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.

MNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 569.75M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.

CELH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 52.03M and revenue of 329.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

MNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 442.99M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 23.9%.

CELH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 77.57M and revenue of 329.28M, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.