PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MNST vs. CELH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MNSTCELH
YTD Return-11.91%-39.14%
1Y Return-9.60%-49.61%
3Y Return (Ann)2.37%1.13%
5Y Return (Ann)11.74%94.22%
10Y Return (Ann)13.03%69.69%
Sharpe Ratio-0.46-0.85
Daily Std Dev23.36%59.84%
Max Drawdown-95.82%-99.79%
Current Drawdown-16.60%-65.48%

Fundamentals


MNSTCELH
Market Cap$49.79B$7.85B
EPS$1.60$1.01
PE Ratio31.7232.85
PEG Ratio1.630.96
Total Revenue (TTM)$7.39B$1.49B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.97B$747.88M
EBITDA (TTM)$2.05B$338.01M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between MNST and CELH is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MNST vs. CELH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a -11.91% return, which is significantly higher than CELH's -39.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has underperformed CELH with an annualized return of 13.03%, while CELH has yielded a comparatively higher 69.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-16.17%
-61.58%
MNST
CELH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MNST vs. CELH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNST
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.46
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.49
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MNST, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.93
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.90, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00-0.90
CELH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CELH, currently valued at -0.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CELH, currently valued at -1.22, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CELH, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.86
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CELH, currently valued at -0.76, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.76
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CELH, currently valued at -1.66, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00-1.66

MNST vs. CELH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNST Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is higher than the CELH Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MNST and CELH.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.46
-0.85
MNST
CELH

Dividends

MNST vs. CELH - Dividend Comparison

Neither MNST nor CELH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MNST vs. CELH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -95.82%, roughly equal to the maximum CELH drawdown of -99.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and CELH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-16.60%
-65.48%
MNST
CELH

Volatility

MNST vs. CELH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 5.96%, while Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) has a volatility of 16.72%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CELH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
5.96%
16.72%
MNST
CELH

Financials

MNST vs. CELH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and Celsius Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items