MGK vs. MGV
MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGK returned 18.97%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for MGV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
MGK vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has outperformed MGV with an annualized return of 18.97%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively lower 13.34% annualized return.
MGK
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 21.62%
- 3Y*
- 23.33%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 18.97%
MGV
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.53%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
MGK vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 3.65% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 15.89% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGK and MGV is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MGK and MGV has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MGK vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGK
MGV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Technology
MGK
MGV
Communication Services
MGK
MGV
Consumer Cyclical
MGK
MGV
Healthcare
MGK
MGV
Financial Services
MGK
MGV
Real Estate
MGK
MGV
Utilities
MGK
MGV
Industrials
MGK
MGV
Basic Materials
MGK
MGV
Consumer Defensive
MGK
MGV
Energy
MGK
-
MGV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGK vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank
MGK
MGV
MGK vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGK | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.50 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 4.45 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | 16.89 | -12.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGK vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and MGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGK | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.43% | -56.07% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.85% | -6.42% | -10.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -13.18% | -10.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -16.54% | -19.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.01% | -35.41% | -0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.14% | -0.82% | -6.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -7.77% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 1.69% | +3.33% |
Volatility
MGK vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 3.49%. This indicates that MGK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGK | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 3.49% | +3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.75% | 7.82% | +5.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.33% | 10.18% | +7.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 13.58% | +9.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 16.32% | +5.64% |
MGK vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MGK and MGV have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGK vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than MGV's 1.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.84% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGK and MGV have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGK has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to MGV (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs MGV's -56.07%.
On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 18.97% vs 13.34% for MGV. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 18.97% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK and MGV have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.34% for MGK.
MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGK and MGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer