PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGK vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGK vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 18.97%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.49% annualized return.


MGK

1D
-2.12%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
3.65%
6M
2.34%
1Y
21.62%
3Y*
23.33%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
18.97%

VGT

1D
-3.68%
1M
0.28%
YTD
23.32%
6M
21.50%
1Y
46.82%
3Y*
30.13%
5Y*
19.51%
10Y*
25.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGK vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
3.65%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
23.32%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and VGT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.94

The correlation between MGK and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

MGK vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGK
VGT

Technology

59.0%
98.5%

Communication Services

15.8%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
0.1%

Healthcare

4.6%
0.0%

Financial Services

4.1%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Utilities

1.0%

-

Industrials

1.0%
0.4%

Basic Materials

0.6%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Technology

MGK
59.0%
VGT
98.5%

Communication Services

MGK
15.8%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

MGK
12.2%
VGT
0.1%

Healthcare

MGK
4.6%
VGT
0.0%

Financial Services

MGK
4.1%
VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

MGK
1.1%
VGT

-

Utilities

MGK
1.0%
VGT

-

Industrials

MGK
1.0%
VGT
0.4%

Basic Materials

MGK
0.6%
VGT
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

MGK
0.4%
VGT

-

Energy

MGK

-

VGT
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGK vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGK vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGKVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

2.87

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.31

8.76

-4.45

MGK vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGK vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGKVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.43%

-54.63%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.85%

-16.40%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-27.23%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-35.07%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

-35.07%

-0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.14%

-7.71%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-7.95%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

5.36%

-0.34%

Volatility

MGK vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) is 7.08%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that MGK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGKVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.08%

11.39%

-4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

18.58%

-4.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.33%

22.72%

-5.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.80%

25.55%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.96%

24.77%

-2.81%

MGK vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGK vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.34%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MGK and VGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VGT has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to MGK (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.49% vs 18.97% for MGK. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 7.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.49% return vs 18.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

MGK and VGT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.34%.

MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGK and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer