PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGK vs. MGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGK vs. MGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than MGC's 9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has outperformed MGC with an annualized return of 19.23%, while MGC has yielded a comparatively lower 16.51% annualized return.


MGK

1D
-1.39%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
5.89%
6M
5.30%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
24.22%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
19.23%

MGC

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
9.05%
6M
8.78%
1Y
27.57%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
16.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGK vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
5.89%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
9.05%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%27.58%21.57%31.14%-3.45%22.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and MGC is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.95

The correlation between MGK and MGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

MGK vs. MGC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGK
MGC

Technology

59.0%
42.9%

Communication Services

15.8%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
9.8%

Healthcare

4.6%
8.6%

Financial Services

4.1%
10.9%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.9%

Utilities

1.0%
0.9%

Industrials

1.0%
6.0%

Basic Materials

0.6%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
4.4%

Energy

-

2.3%

Technology

MGK
59.0%
MGC
42.9%

Communication Services

MGK
15.8%
MGC
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MGK
12.2%
MGC
9.8%

Healthcare

MGK
4.6%
MGC
8.6%

Financial Services

MGK
4.1%
MGC
10.9%

Real Estate

MGK
1.1%
MGC
0.9%

Utilities

MGK
1.0%
MGC
0.9%

Industrials

MGK
1.0%
MGC
6.0%

Basic Materials

MGK
0.6%
MGC
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

MGK
0.4%
MGC
4.4%

Energy

MGK

-

MGC
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGK vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGK vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGKMGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.81

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.19

12.20

-7.01

MGK vs. MGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the MGC Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and MGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGK vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum MGC drawdown of -52.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and MGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGKMGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.43%

-52.26%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.85%

-9.85%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-19.28%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-25.74%

-10.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

-33.07%

-2.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.13%

-2.36%

-2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-7.17%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.00%

2.27%

+2.73%

Volatility

MGK vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) at 5.00%. This indicates that MGK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGKMGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

5.00%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.63%

10.23%

+3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.22%

13.01%

+4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.78%

17.37%

+5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

18.27%

+3.70%

MGK vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MGK and MGC have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGK vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than MGC's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
0.88%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MGK and MGC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MGK has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to MGC (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs MGC's -52.26%.

On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 19.23% vs 16.51% for MGC. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, MGC has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 19.23% return vs 16.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGK and MGC have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

MGC has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.

MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MGC is Large Cap Blend Equities. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index.

MGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGK and MGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer