PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGK vs. FDIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGK vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has outperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 18.85%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.98% annualized return.


MGK

1D
0.22%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
5.33%
6M
6.21%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
18.85%

FDIS

1D
0.20%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.01%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
12.39%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGK vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
5.33%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.01%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and FDIS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.84

The correlation between MGK and FDIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MGK vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGK
FDIS

Technology

56.1%
1.0%

Communication Services

17.3%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
96.7%

Healthcare

4.5%
0.1%

Financial Services

4.5%
0.1%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.1%

Utilities

1.2%

-

Industrials

1.1%
0.9%

Basic Materials

0.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
1.1%

Energy

-

-

Technology

MGK
56.1%
FDIS
1.0%

Communication Services

MGK
17.3%
FDIS
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MGK
12.8%
FDIS
96.7%

Healthcare

MGK
4.5%
FDIS
0.1%

Financial Services

MGK
4.5%
FDIS
0.1%

Real Estate

MGK
1.3%
FDIS
0.1%

Utilities

MGK
1.2%
FDIS

-

Industrials

MGK
1.1%
FDIS
0.9%

Basic Materials

MGK
0.7%
FDIS

-

Consumer Defensive

MGK
0.4%
FDIS
1.1%

Energy

MGK

-

FDIS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGK vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGK vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGKFDISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.11

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

0.72

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.65

2.24

+2.41

MGK vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGK vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and FDIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGKFDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.43%

-39.16%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.85%

-15.50%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-27.43%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-39.16%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

-39.16%

+3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.63%

-4.58%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-7.49%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

5.01%

-0.04%

Volatility

MGK vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) have volatilities of 5.96% and 6.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGKFDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

6.19%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

13.44%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.87%

18.52%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

23.92%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.93%

22.32%

-0.39%

MGK vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGK vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than FDIS's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGK and FDIS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIS has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to MGK (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 18.85% vs 13.98% for FDIS. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 13.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FDIS.

FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.

MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDIS is Consumer Discretionary Equities. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.08% for FDIS.

MGK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGK and FDIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer