METV vs. GINN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - METV tracks the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, METV returned 21.73%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for GINN. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. METV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

METV vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than GINN's 5.00% return.

METV

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: -4.22%
• YTD: -3.41%
• 6M: -3.49%
• 1Y: 11.35%
• 3Y*: 21.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GINN

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 3.65%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 5.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METV vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	-3.41%	30.83%	24.93%	60.57%	-52.66%	0.66%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	5.00%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-32.40%	-2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between METV and GINN is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.91

The correlation between METV and GINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

METV vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METV	GINN
Technology	55.6%	32.6%
Communication Services	33.6%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	12.7%
Financial Services	3.1%	12.4%
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.8%
Energy	-	1.7%
Healthcare	-	20.6%
Industrials	-	4.7%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Utilities	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

METV vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METV

METV Risk / Return Rank: 14
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 15
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 13

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 35
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METV vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METV	GINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	1.22	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	1.75	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.22	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	1.54	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.89	5.39	-4.50

METV vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METV vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and GINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	METV	GINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.64%	-41.25%	-18.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.27%	-13.18%	-15.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.27%	-22.25%	-6.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.56%	-4.93%	-9.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.86%	-13.28%	-12.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.72%	3.75%	+8.97%

Volatility

METV vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 5.81%. This indicates that METV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METV	GINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.11%	5.81%	+3.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.24%	12.92%	+6.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.02%	16.57%	+8.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.03%	21.44%	+8.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.03%	21.07%	+8.96%

METV vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

METV vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than GINN's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.20%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	0.19%	0.18%	0.00%	0.17%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METV and GINN in my portfolio?

METV and GINN have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METV or GINN?

METV has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to GINN (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METV dropped -59.64% vs GINN's -41.25%.

Which ETF is better, METV or GINN?

On 3-year performance, METV leads with 21.73% vs 18.28% for GINN. On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METV or GINN?

Over the 3-year period, METV has performed better with a 21.73% return vs 18.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METV or GINN?

GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for METV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METV or GINN?

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.19% for METV.

What is the main difference between METV and GINN?

METV tracks Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for METV and 0.50% for GINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.