PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METV vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

METV vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

METV vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
-14.16%30.83%24.93%60.57%-52.66%0.40%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
-4.76%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%12.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a -14.16% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -4.76% return.


METV

1D
1.19%
1M
-3.59%
YTD
-14.16%
6M
-22.31%
1Y
17.96%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
1.24%
1M
-3.79%
YTD
-4.76%
6M
-2.89%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
18.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


METV vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

METV vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METV
METV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METV vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METVQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

1.07

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

1.66

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.24

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

2.00

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.84

7.32

-5.48

METV vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METVQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.07

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.38

-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between METV and QQQ is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

METV vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than QQQ's 0.48% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
0.21%0.18%0.00%0.17%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.48%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Drawdowns

METV vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and QQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


METVQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.64%

-82.97%

+23.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.27%

-12.62%

-15.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.08%

-7.86%

-16.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.41%

-32.99%

+6.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.72%

3.44%

+7.28%

Volatility

METV vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) has a higher volatility of 9.31% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.61%. This indicates that METV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


METVQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.31%

6.61%

+2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.97%

12.82%

+6.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.95%

22.70%

+6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.22%

22.38%

+7.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.22%

22.25%

+7.97%