METV vs. AMZP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP).

METV and AMZP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. METV is a passively managed fund by Roundhill Investments that tracks the performance of the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021. AMZP is an actively managed fund by Kurv. It was launched on Oct 31, 2023.

Performance

METV vs. AMZP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

METV vs. AMZP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	-15.18%	30.83%	24.93%	16.46%
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	-13.27%	9.56%	37.42%	7.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a -15.18% return, which is significantly lower than AMZP's -13.27% return.

METV

• 1D: 4.46%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: -15.18%
• 6M: -22.53%
• 1Y: 18.30%
• 3Y*: 19.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMZP

• 1D: 4.39%
• 1M: -1.18%
• YTD: -13.27%
• 6M: -9.25%
• 1Y: 8.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METV vs. AMZP - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZP's 0.99% expense ratio.

AMZP

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF

METV

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF

Return for Risk

METV vs. AMZP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METV

METV Risk / Return Rank: 33
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 36
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

AMZP

AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 20
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 22
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METV vs. AMZP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	METV	AMZP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	0.26	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	0.59	+0.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.08	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	0.30	+0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.63	0.78	+0.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

METV vs. AMZP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the AMZP Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and AMZP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METV	AMZP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	0.26	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.58	-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between METV and AMZP is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

METV vs. AMZP - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than AMZP's 24.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	0.21%	0.18%	0.00%	0.17%	0.09%
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	24.42%	22.04%	15.15%	2.45%	0.00%

Drawdowns

METV vs. AMZP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than AMZP's maximum drawdown of -27.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and AMZP.

Drawdown Indicators

	METV	AMZP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.64%	-27.36%	-32.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.27%	-23.64%	-4.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.97%	-19.39%	-5.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.41%	-6.12%	-20.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.62%	8.98%	+1.64%

Volatility

METV vs. AMZP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is 9.46%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) has a volatility of 10.82%. This indicates that METV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METV	AMZP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	10.82%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.94%	22.03%	-3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.94%	31.81%	-2.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.23%	26.52%	+3.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.23%	26.52%	+3.71%