METV vs. SNSR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) and SNSR (Global X Internet of Things ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - METV tracks the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net while SNSR tracks the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, METV returned 21.73%/yr vs 14.82%/yr for SNSR. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for SNSR.

Performance

METV vs. SNSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than SNSR's 33.19% return.

METV

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: -4.22%
• YTD: -3.41%
• 6M: -3.49%
• 1Y: 11.35%
• 3Y*: 21.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SNSR

• 1D: -4.54%
• 1M: -2.30%
• YTD: 33.19%
• 6M: 31.76%
• 1Y: 36.47%
• 3Y*: 14.82%
• 5Y*: 7.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METV vs. SNSR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	-3.41%	30.83%	24.93%	60.57%	-52.66%	0.66%
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	33.19%	6.46%	-0.45%	23.06%	-25.50%	9.65%

Correlation

The correlation between METV and SNSR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.79

The correlation between METV and SNSR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

METV vs. SNSR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METV	SNSR
Technology	55.6%	80.5%
Communication Services	33.6%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	-
Financial Services	3.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	5.1%
Industrials	-	13.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

METV vs. SNSR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METV

METV Risk / Return Rank: 14
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 15
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 13

SNSR

SNSR Risk / Return Rank: 45
SNSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SNSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
SNSR Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SNSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SNSR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METV vs. SNSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METV	SNSR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	1.39	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	1.93	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.25	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	2.56	-2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.89	7.58	-6.69

METV vs. SNSR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the SNSR Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and SNSR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METV vs. SNSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than SNSR's maximum drawdown of -38.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and SNSR.

Drawdown Indicators

	METV	SNSR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.64%	-38.46%	-21.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.27%	-14.30%	-13.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.27%	-28.32%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.56%	-8.51%	-6.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.86%	-9.48%	-16.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.72%	4.82%	+7.90%

Volatility

METV vs. SNSR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is 9.11%, while Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) has a volatility of 14.09%. This indicates that METV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METV	SNSR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.11%	14.09%	-4.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.24%	21.71%	-2.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.02%	26.39%	-1.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.03%	25.69%	+4.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.03%	24.89%	+5.14%

METV vs. SNSR - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SNSR's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

METV vs. SNSR - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than SNSR's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	0.19%	0.18%	0.00%	0.17%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	0.41%	0.54%	0.73%	0.74%	0.82%	0.43%	0.21%	1.12%	1.25%	1.11%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METV and SNSR in my portfolio?

METV and SNSR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METV or SNSR?

SNSR has higher volatility (14.09%) compared to METV (9.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METV dropped -59.64% vs SNSR's -38.46%.

Which ETF is better, METV or SNSR?

On 3-year performance, METV leads with 21.73% vs 14.82% for SNSR. On fees, SNSR is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, METV has been the lower-risk option at 9.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METV or SNSR?

Over the 3-year period, METV has performed better with a 21.73% return vs 14.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METV or SNSR?

SNSR is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for METV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METV or SNSR?

SNSR has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.19% for METV.

What is the main difference between METV and SNSR?

METV tracks Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while SNSR tracks Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for METV and 0.68% for SNSR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.