METV vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK).
METV and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. METV is a passively managed fund by Roundhill Investments that tracks the performance of the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both METV and XLK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: METV or XLK.
Correlation
The correlation between METV and XLK is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
METV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
METV:
0.46
XLK:
0.02
METV:
0.76
XLK:
0.19
METV:
1.09
XLK:
1.02
METV:
0.32
XLK:
0.03
METV:
1.96
XLK:
0.09
METV:
5.16%
XLK:
6.15%
METV:
21.99%
XLK:
24.18%
METV:
-59.64%
XLK:
-82.05%
METV:
-18.79%
XLK:
-13.97%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a -4.80% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's -10.39% return.
METV
-4.80%
-6.49%
2.93%
9.87%
N/A
N/A
XLK
-10.39%
-7.62%
-5.25%
0.28%
22.69%
19.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
METV vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
METV vs. XLK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
METV
XLK
METV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
METV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
METV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.75% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% | 1.75% |
Drawdowns
METV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
METV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) at 8.33%. This indicates that METV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.