METV vs. XLK

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - METV tracks the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, METV returned 4.64%/yr vs 18.87%/yr for XLK. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. METV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.

Performance

METV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a -2.77% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 22.09% return.

METV

• 1D: -2.92%
• 1M: -2.51%
• 6M: 0.77%
• YTD: -2.77%
• 1Y: 3.23%
• 3Y*: 19.08%
• 5Y*: 4.64%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.92%

XLK

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -2.90%
• 6M: 22.17%
• YTD: 22.09%
• 1Y: 37.14%
• 3Y*: 26.04%
• 5Y*: 18.87%
• 10Y*: 23.77%
• ALL TIME*: 10.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	$748.35K	$896.30K	$954.56K
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	$1.61B	$1.67B	$2.22B

METV vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	-2.77%	30.83%	24.93%	60.57%	-52.66%	0.66%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	22.09%	24.61%	21.63%	56.02%	-27.73%	18.05%

Correlation

The correlation between METV and XLK is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.84

The correlation between METV and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

METV vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METV	XLK
Technology	54.1%	99.1%
Communication Services	17.7%	0.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	-
Financial Services	3.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

METV vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

METV

METV Risk / Return Rank: 10
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 10
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 10

XLK

XLK Risk / Return Rank: 55
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

METV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METV	XLK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	1.34	-1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	1.85	-1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.23	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	2.16	-2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.09	5.85	-5.94

METV vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and XLK.

Drawdown Indicators

	METV	XLK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.64%	-82.05%	+22.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.27%	-15.92%	-12.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.27%	-25.66%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.64%	-33.56%	-26.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.00%	-11.43%	-2.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.57%	-34.80%	+9.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.34%	5.86%	+7.48%

Volatility

METV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is 6.13%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 9.58%. This indicates that METV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METV	XLK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.13%	9.58%	-3.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.71%	21.81%	-2.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.60%	25.59%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.07%	25.75%	+4.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.89%	24.90%	+4.99%

METV vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

METV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than XLK's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	0.18%	0.18%	0.00%	0.17%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	0.45%	0.54%	0.66%	0.76%	1.04%	0.65%	0.92%	1.16%	1.60%	1.37%	1.74%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METV and XLK in my portfolio?

METV and XLK have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METV or XLK?

XLK has higher volatility (9.58%) compared to METV (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METV dropped -59.64% vs XLK's -82.05%.

Which ETF is better, METV or XLK?

On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 18.87% vs 4.64% for METV. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, METV has been the lower-risk option at 6.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METV or XLK?

Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 18.87% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METV or XLK?

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for METV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METV or XLK?

XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.18% for METV.

What is the main difference between METV and XLK?

METV tracks Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for METV and 0.08% for XLK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.