PortfoliosLab logo
METV vs. XLK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between METV and XLK is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

METV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-9.63%
43.45%
METV
XLK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

METV:

0.64

XLK:

0.22

Sortino Ratio

METV:

1.07

XLK:

0.51

Omega Ratio

METV:

1.14

XLK:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

METV:

0.56

XLK:

0.25

Martin Ratio

METV:

2.59

XLK:

0.83

Ulcer Index

METV:

6.76%

XLK:

7.78%

Daily Std Dev

METV:

27.37%

XLK:

30.19%

Max Drawdown

METV:

-59.64%

XLK:

-82.05%

Current Drawdown

METV:

-19.15%

XLK:

-15.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a -5.22% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's -11.50% return.


METV

YTD

-5.22%

1M

-5.35%

6M

2.71%

1Y

15.70%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XLK

YTD

-11.50%

1M

-5.92%

6M

-10.03%

1Y

4.46%

5Y*

19.37%

10Y*

18.34%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


METV vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for METV: current value is 0.75%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
METV: 0.75%
Expense ratio chart for XLK: current value is 0.13%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
XLK: 0.13%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

METV vs. XLK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of METV is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of METV is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of METV is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of METV is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of METV is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of METV is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLK is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLK is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLK is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLK is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLK is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLK is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

METV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for METV, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
METV: 0.64
XLK: 0.22
The chart of Sortino ratio for METV, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
METV: 1.07
XLK: 0.51
The chart of Omega ratio for METV, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
METV: 1.14
XLK: 1.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for METV, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
METV: 0.56
XLK: 0.25
The chart of Martin ratio for METV, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
METV: 2.59
XLK: 0.83

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and XLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.64
0.22
METV
XLK

Dividends

METV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

METV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
0.00%0.00%0.17%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.76%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%1.75%

Drawdowns

METV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-19.15%
-15.03%
METV
XLK

Volatility

METV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is 17.61%, while Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) has a volatility of 19.05%. This indicates that METV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.61%
19.05%
METV
XLK