PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METV vs. DTCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METV vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a -2.77% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 30.53% return.


METV

1D
-2.92%
1M
-2.51%
6M
0.77%
YTD
-2.77%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.92%

DTCR

1D
-0.90%
1M
-3.58%
6M
12.55%
YTD
30.53%
1Y
47.91%
3Y*
27.27%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.41M$38.68M$44.72M
$748.35K$896.30K$954.56K

METV vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
-2.77%30.83%24.93%60.57%-52.66%0.66%
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
30.53%28.99%14.92%18.93%-30.89%8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between METV and DTCR is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.67

The correlation between METV and DTCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METV vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

METV
METV Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

METV vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


METVDTCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.30

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

2.55

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

8.11

-8.20

METV vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

METV vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than DTCR's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and DTCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METVDTCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.64%

-38.98%

-20.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.27%

-17.88%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

-24.96%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.64%

-38.98%

-20.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.00%

-15.15%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.57%

-12.26%

-13.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.34%

5.62%

+7.72%

Volatility

METV vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is 6.13%, while Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) has a volatility of 8.80%. This indicates that METV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METVDTCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

8.80%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.71%

19.77%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.60%

24.75%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.07%

22.50%

+7.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.89%

22.25%

+7.64%

METV vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

METV vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than DTCR's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.90%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
0.18%0.18%0.00%0.17%0.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


METV and DTCR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTCR has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to METV (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METV dropped -59.64% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

On 5-year performance, DTCR leads with 11.34% vs 4.64% for METV. On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, METV has been the lower-risk option at 6.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 11.34% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for METV.

DTCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.18% for METV.

METV is categorized as Technology Equities, while DTCR is REIT. METV tracks Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for METV and 0.50% for DTCR.

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METV and DTCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer