PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METV vs. BETZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

METV vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

METV vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
-14.16%30.83%24.93%60.57%-52.66%0.40%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
-13.39%15.75%10.22%21.17%-42.02%-18.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a -14.16% return, which is significantly lower than BETZ's -13.39% return.


METV

1D
1.19%
1M
-3.59%
YTD
-14.16%
6M
-22.31%
1Y
17.96%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
10Y*

BETZ

1D
1.71%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
-13.39%
6M
-19.50%
1Y
0.94%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
-9.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


METV vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both METV and BETZ have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

METV vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METV
METV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BETZ
BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METV vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METVBETZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

0.04

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

0.23

+0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.03

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

0.04

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.84

0.08

+1.76

METV vs. BETZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the BETZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and BETZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METVBETZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.04

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.11

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between METV and BETZ is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

METV vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than BETZ's 5.28% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
0.21%0.18%0.00%0.17%0.09%0.00%0.00%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
5.28%4.57%0.86%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.28%

Drawdowns

METV vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, roughly equal to the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and BETZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


METVBETZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.64%

-60.82%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.27%

-29.20%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.08%

-41.41%

+17.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.41%

-33.65%

+7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.72%

14.15%

-3.43%

Volatility

METV vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) has a higher volatility of 9.31% compared to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) at 8.24%. This indicates that METV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


METVBETZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.31%

8.24%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.97%

15.73%

+3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.95%

23.04%

+5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.22%

27.26%

+2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.22%

28.13%

+2.09%