BETZ vs. SPY
BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BETZ returned -5.84%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for SPY. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
BETZ vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -8.87% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.13% return.
BETZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- -8.87%
- 1Y
- -16.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- -5.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.39%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $205.48K | $310.34K | $782.30K | |
| $37.27B | $35.99B | $39.23B |
BETZ vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -8.87% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -42.02% | -3.91% | 65.99% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.13% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 21.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and SPY is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BETZ and SPY has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BETZ vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BETZ
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
BETZ
SPY
Technology
BETZ
SPY
Communication Services
BETZ
SPY
Industrials
BETZ
SPY
Financial Services
BETZ
SPY
Basic Materials
BETZ
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
BETZ
-
SPY
Energy
BETZ
-
SPY
Healthcare
BETZ
-
SPY
Real Estate
BETZ
-
SPY
Utilities
BETZ
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETZ vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
BETZ
SPY
BETZ vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BETZ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.27 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.20 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 9.40 | -10.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETZ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -55.19% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -8.88% | -20.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.20% | -18.76% | -10.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.79% | -24.50% | -35.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.35% | -1.40% | -36.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -9.01% | -24.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.92% | 2.08% | +16.84% |
Volatility
BETZ vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.58%. This indicates that BETZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETZ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 3.58% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 10.14% | +6.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.17% | 12.89% | +8.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 17.18% | +9.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.85% | 17.95% | +9.90% |
BETZ vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BETZ vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.02% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BETZ and SPY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BETZ has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to SPY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 12.76% vs -5.84% for BETZ. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 12.76% return vs -5.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.
BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
BETZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. BETZ tracks Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETZ and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer