BETZ vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ).
BETZ and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BETZ is a passively managed fund by Roundhill Investments that tracks the performance of the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both BETZ and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BETZ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BETZ vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -14.85% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -42.02% | -3.91% | 60.54% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | -5.93% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 34.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -14.85% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -5.93% return.
BETZ
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -14.85%
- 6M
- -21.76%
- 1Y
- -0.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- -9.64%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- 23.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BETZ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BETZ vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
BETZ
QQQ
BETZ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BETZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | 1.05 | -1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.13 | 1.63 | -1.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.23 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 1.88 | -1.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 6.95 | -7.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BETZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 1.05 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.58 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.37 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and QQQ is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BETZ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.37% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and QQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -82.97% | +22.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -12.62% | -16.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.82% | -35.12% | -25.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.39% | -8.98% | -33.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -32.99% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.06% | 3.41% | +10.65% |
Volatility
BETZ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.51%. This indicates that BETZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BETZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 6.51% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.98% | 12.77% | +3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.02% | 22.67% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 22.39% | +4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.13% | 22.25% | +5.88% |