PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BETZ vs. MGM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BETZ and MGM is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

BETZ vs. MGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
22.61%
1.04%
BETZ
MGM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BETZ:

1.22

MGM:

-0.35

Sortino Ratio

BETZ:

1.73

MGM:

-0.26

Omega Ratio

BETZ:

1.21

MGM:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

BETZ:

0.44

MGM:

-0.19

Martin Ratio

BETZ:

5.01

MGM:

-0.69

Ulcer Index

BETZ:

4.49%

MGM:

18.69%

Daily Std Dev

BETZ:

18.46%

MGM:

36.67%

Max Drawdown

BETZ:

-60.82%

MGM:

-98.11%

Current Drawdown

BETZ:

-32.88%

MGM:

-57.75%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BETZ having a 14.84% return and MGM slightly higher at 14.89%.


BETZ

YTD

14.84%

1M

13.67%

6M

22.41%

1Y

22.41%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MGM

YTD

14.89%

1M

21.19%

6M

-0.65%

1Y

-6.42%

5Y*

4.60%

10Y*

6.44%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BETZ vs. MGM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BETZ is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BETZ is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BETZ is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BETZ is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BETZ is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BETZ is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

MGM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MGM is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MGM is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MGM is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MGM is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MGM is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MGM is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BETZ vs. MGM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BETZ, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.22-0.35
The chart of Sortino ratio for BETZ, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.73-0.26
The chart of Omega ratio for BETZ, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.210.96
The chart of Calmar ratio for BETZ, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.44-0.34
The chart of Martin ratio for BETZ, currently valued at 5.01, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.005.01-0.69
BETZ
MGM

The current BETZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the MGM Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETZ and MGM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.22
-0.35
BETZ
MGM

Dividends

BETZ vs. MGM - Dividend Comparison

BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while MGM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
0.74%0.85%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGM
MGM Resorts International
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.03%0.50%1.56%1.98%1.32%

Drawdowns

BETZ vs. MGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, smaller than the maximum MGM drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and MGM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-32.88%
-21.79%
BETZ
MGM

Volatility

BETZ vs. MGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 4.95%, while MGM Resorts International (MGM) has a volatility of 16.66%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.95%
16.66%
BETZ
MGM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab