BETZ vs. MGM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while MGM (MGM Resorts International) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, BETZ returned -8.45%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for MGM. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

BETZ vs. MGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than MGM's 32.53% return.

BETZ

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: -9.29%
• 6M: -6.63%
• 1Y: -5.17%
• 3Y*: 5.35%
• 5Y*: -8.45%
• 10Y*: —

MGM

• 1D: -4.60%
• 1M: 25.61%
• YTD: 32.53%
• 6M: 36.84%
• 1Y: 55.15%
• 3Y*: 5.91%
• 5Y*: 2.60%
• 10Y*: 7.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETZ vs. MGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	-9.29%	15.75%	10.22%	21.17%	-42.02%	-3.91%	60.54%
MGM MGM Resorts International	32.53%	5.31%	-22.45%	33.25%	-25.27%	42.47%	45.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BETZ and MGM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020	0.65

The correlation between BETZ and MGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BETZ vs. MGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETZ

BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 6
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7

MGM

MGM Risk / Return Rank: 77
MGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
MGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
MGM Omega Ratio Rank: 74
MGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
MGM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETZ vs. MGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BETZ	MGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	1.36	-1.62
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	2.26	-2.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.26	-0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.22	2.32	-2.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.38	5.00	-5.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BETZ vs. MGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the MGM Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETZ and MGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BETZ	MGM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25	1.36	-1.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32	0.06	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.16	-0.02

Drawdowns

BETZ vs. MGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, smaller than the maximum MGM drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and MGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETZ	MGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.82%	-98.11%	+37.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.20%	-22.76%	-6.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.20%	-49.33%	+20.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.35%	-49.33%	-11.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.64%	-48.68%	+10.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.81%	-46.42%	+12.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.93%	10.56%	+6.37%

Volatility

BETZ vs. MGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 5.46%, while MGM Resorts International (MGM) has a volatility of 19.28%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETZ	MGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.46%	19.28%	-13.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.77%	31.58%	-15.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.49%	40.73%	-20.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.95%	40.46%	-13.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.95%	45.83%	-17.88%

Dividends

BETZ vs. MGM - Dividend Comparison

BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, while MGM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	5.04%	4.57%	0.86%	0.00%	0.66%	0.00%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MGM MGM Resorts International	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.02%	0.50%	1.56%	1.98%	1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETZ and MGM in my portfolio?

BETZ and MGM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BETZ or MGM?

MGM has higher volatility (19.28%) compared to BETZ (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs MGM's -98.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.