BETZ vs. MGM

In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly higher than MGM's -8.60% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BETZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the MGM Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETZ and MGM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while MGM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, smaller than the maximum MGM drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and MGM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 12.99%, while MGM Resorts International (MGM) has a volatility of 21.55%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.