BETZ vs. ODDS
BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and ODDS (Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while ODDS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BETZ returned 3.15%/yr vs 6.71%/yr for ODDS. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for ODDS.
Performance
BETZ vs. ODDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -8.87% return, which is significantly higher than ODDS's -13.44% return.
BETZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- -8.87%
- 1Y
- -16.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- -5.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.39%
ODDS
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- 6M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -13.44%
- 1Y
- -21.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $205.48K | $310.34K | $782.30K | |
| $13.95K | $16.12K | $15.11K |
BETZ vs. ODDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -8.87% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -22.72% |
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | -13.44% | 16.71% | 27.61% | 25.03% | -15.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and ODDS is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022 | 0.83 |
The correlation between BETZ and ODDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
BETZ vs. ODDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BETZ
ODDS
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
BETZ
ODDS
Technology
BETZ
ODDS
Communication Services
BETZ
ODDS
Industrials
BETZ
ODDS
Financial Services
BETZ
ODDS
Basic Materials
BETZ
-
ODDS
-
Consumer Defensive
BETZ
-
ODDS
-
Energy
BETZ
-
ODDS
-
Healthcare
BETZ
-
ODDS
-
Real Estate
BETZ
-
ODDS
-
Utilities
BETZ
-
ODDS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETZ vs. ODDS — Risk / Return Rank
BETZ
ODDS
BETZ vs. ODDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BETZ | ODDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.83 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | -0.64 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | -0.98 | +0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. ODDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than ODDS's maximum drawdown of -35.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and ODDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETZ | ODDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -35.09% | -25.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -35.09% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.20% | -35.09% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.35% | -27.81% | -10.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -9.89% | -24.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.92% | 22.94% | -4.02% |
Volatility
BETZ vs. ODDS - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) have volatilities of 5.96% and 6.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETZ | ODDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 6.06% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 17.74% | -0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.17% | 21.48% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 24.84% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.85% | 24.84% | +3.01% |
BETZ vs. ODDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ODDS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
BETZ vs. ODDS - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than ODDS's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.02% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | 0.71% | 2.59% | 0.56% | 0.66% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BETZ and ODDS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ODDS has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to BETZ (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs ODDS's -35.09%.
On 3-year performance, ODDS leads with 6.71% vs 3.15% for BETZ. On fees, ODDS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, BETZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ODDS has performed better with a 6.71% return vs 3.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ODDS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.
BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 0.71% for ODDS.
BETZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while ODDS is Technology Equities. BETZ tracks Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while ODDS tracks BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.63% for ODDS.
BETZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.83 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETZ and ODDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer