MEME vs. LRNZ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MEME charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LRNZ.

Performance

MEME vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEME achieves a 89.03% return, which is significantly higher than LRNZ's 33.31% return.

MEME

• 1D: 4.46%
• 1M: 34.40%
• YTD: 89.03%
• 6M: 82.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRNZ

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 37.00%
• YTD: 33.31%
• 6M: 33.31%
• 1Y: 52.54%
• 3Y*: 27.10%
• 5Y*: 9.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEME vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	89.03%	-36.83%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	33.31%	-2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MEME and LRNZ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.47

MEME vs. LRNZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MEME	LRNZ
Technology	58.8%	78.4%
Industrials	29.9%	-
Utilities	10.7%	-
Financial Services	5.7%	-
Communication Services	5.5%	5.3%
Healthcare	5.4%	16.3%
Energy	4.8%	-
Basic Materials	4.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

MEME vs. LRNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRNZ

LRNZ Risk / Return Rank: 45
LRNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LRNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
LRNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 47
LRNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
LRNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEME vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MEME	LRNZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.42	+0.01

Drawdowns

MEME vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEME drawdown since its inception was -48.78%, smaller than the maximum LRNZ drawdown of -61.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEME and LRNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEME	LRNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.78%	-61.33%	+12.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-26.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-0.78%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.05%	-26.68%	-3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.93%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MEME	LRNZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.18%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.11%	28.84%	+45.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.11%	37.27%	+36.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.11%	37.64%	+36.47%

MEME vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEME has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEME vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEME nor LRNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEME and LRNZ in my portfolio?

MEME and LRNZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MEME or LRNZ?

On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEME or LRNZ?

LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEME or LRNZ?

MEME and LRNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MEME and LRNZ?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and TrueMark Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for MEME and 0.68% for LRNZ.