MEME vs. TMFC
MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) and TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MEME is actively managed, while TMFC is passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MEME charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TMFC.
Performance
MEME vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEME achieves a 67.74% return, which is significantly higher than TMFC's 5.63% return.
MEME
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- 67.74%
- 6M
- 49.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFC
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 24.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.51%
- 10Y*
- —
MEME vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 67.74% | -38.00% |
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 5.63% | 1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEME and TMFC is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.53 |
MEME vs. TMFC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MEME
TMFC
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
MEME
TMFC
Industrials
MEME
TMFC
Financial Services
MEME
TMFC
Communication Services
MEME
TMFC
Healthcare
MEME
TMFC
Utilities
MEME
TMFC
Energy
MEME
TMFC
Basic Materials
MEME
TMFC
Consumer Cyclical
MEME
-
TMFC
Consumer Defensive
MEME
-
TMFC
Real Estate
MEME
-
TMFC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEME vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank
MEME
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMFC
MEME vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MEME | TMFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.78 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MEME vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEME drawdown since its inception was -48.78%, which is greater than TMFC's maximum drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEME and TMFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEME | TMFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.78% | -33.06% | -15.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.86% | -3.67% | -8.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.69% | -6.75% | -21.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.48% | — |
Volatility
MEME vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEME | TMFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.35% | 14.24% | +61.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.35% | 20.48% | +54.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.35% | 22.00% | +53.35% |
MEME vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEME has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFC's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEME vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison
MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.40% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEME and TMFC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMFC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMFC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.
TMFC has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for MEME and 0.50% for TMFC.
Find the right allocation for MEME and TMFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer