PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MEME vs. URA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MEME vs. URA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MEME is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. MEME is actively managed, while URA is passively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.

Performance

MEME vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEME achieves a 13.39% return, which is significantly higher than URA's -8.57% return.

MEME

1D
0.72%
1M
-16.21%
6M
-1.26%
YTD
13.39%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

URA

1D
-1.64%
1M
-9.62%
6M
-28.95%
YTD
-8.57%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
25.57%
5Y*
18.90%
10Y*
14.85%
ALL TIME*
-3.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

MEME

Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
$1.46M$1.32M$2.06M

URA

Global X Uranium ETF
$122.45M$118.35M$170.14M

MEME vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF		13.39%-38.00%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF		-8.57%-12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between MEME and URA is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.73

MEME vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MEME
URA

Technology

81.9%
0.9%

Industrials

7.2%
21.4%

Healthcare

6.2%

-

Communication Services

5.5%

-

Financial Services

5.4%

-

Utilities

4.9%
7.1%

Energy

4.8%
58.7%

Basic Materials

4.6%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

MEME
81.9%
URA
0.9%

Industrials

MEME
7.2%
URA
21.4%

Healthcare

MEME
6.2%
URA

-

Communication Services

MEME
5.5%
URA

-

Financial Services

MEME
5.4%
URA

-

Utilities

MEME
4.9%
URA
7.1%

Energy

MEME
4.8%
URA
58.7%

Basic Materials

MEME
4.6%
URA
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MEME
4.1%
URA

-

Consumer Defensive

MEME

-

URA

-

Real Estate

MEME

-

URA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Roundhill Meme Stock ETF

Global X Uranium ETF

Often compared with MEME:
MEME vs. AFLGMEME vs. ANEWMEME vs. IWFMEME vs. BCHPMEME vs. BELTMEME vs. TMFCMEME vs. QQQM
Often compared with URA:
URA vs. NLRURA vs. URNMURA vs. NUKZURA vs. CCJURA vs. UUUUURA vs. URANURA vs. SPY

Return for Risk

MEME vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MEME vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MEMEURADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

0.08

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

0.49

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.06

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

0.10

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

0.22

—

MEME vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEME vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEME drawdown since its inception was -50.08%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEME and URA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MEMEURADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.08%

-93.54%

+43.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-39.30%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-39.30%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-39.30%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-61.45%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.42%

-55.66%

+15.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.26%

-74.75%

+45.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

18.11%

—

Volatility

MEME vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MEMEURADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

13.54%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

38.35%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.06%

52.24%

+26.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.06%

44.10%

+34.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.06%

38.10%

+40.96%

MEME vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MEME and URA have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

Dividends

MEME vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF		5.33%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

MEME and URA have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEME and URA have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

URA has the higher dividend yield at 5.33%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

MEME is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while URA is Uranium. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEME and URA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer