PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEME vs. BCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEME vs. BCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEME achieves a 67.74% return, which is significantly higher than BCHP's -4.08% return.


MEME

1D
0.58%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
67.74%
6M
49.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCHP

1D
-2.07%
1M
-3.85%
YTD
-4.08%
6M
-4.11%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEME vs. BCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
67.74%-38.00%
BCHP
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
-4.08%-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MEME and BCHP is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.44

MEME vs. BCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MEME
BCHP

Technology

66.7%
33.7%

Industrials

22.3%
9.7%

Financial Services

5.5%
24.9%

Communication Services

5.5%
13.0%

Healthcare

5.4%
3.6%

Utilities

4.9%

-

Energy

4.8%

-

Basic Materials

4.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

15.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Technology

MEME
66.7%
BCHP
33.7%

Industrials

MEME
22.3%
BCHP
9.7%

Financial Services

MEME
5.5%
BCHP
24.9%

Communication Services

MEME
5.5%
BCHP
13.0%

Healthcare

MEME
5.4%
BCHP
3.6%

Utilities

MEME
4.9%
BCHP

-

Energy

MEME
4.8%
BCHP

-

Basic Materials

MEME
4.6%
BCHP

-

Consumer Cyclical

MEME

-

BCHP
15.1%

Consumer Defensive

MEME

-

BCHP

-

Real Estate

MEME

-

BCHP
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEME vs. BCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BCHP
BCHP Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEME vs. BCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEMEBCHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.45

MEME vs. BCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEME vs. BCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEME drawdown since its inception was -48.78%, which is greater than BCHP's maximum drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEME and BCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEMEBCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.78%

-18.56%

-30.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.86%

-6.82%

-5.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.69%

-3.00%

-25.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

Volatility

MEME vs. BCHP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEMEBCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.35%

16.59%

+58.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.35%

17.00%

+58.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.35%

17.00%

+58.35%

MEME vs. BCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEME has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BCHP's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEME vs. BCHP - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEME nor BCHP has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BCHP
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
0.00%0.00%1.02%0.19%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEME and BCHP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCHP is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCHP is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

MEME and BCHP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for MEME and 0.58% for BCHP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEME and BCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer