MAR vs. KMB
MAR (Marriott International, Inc.) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. MAR operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MAR returned 21.03%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KMB. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAR vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAR achieves a 30.26% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MAR has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 21.03%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.
MAR
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 14.20%
- YTD
- 30.26%
- 6M
- 35.28%
- 1Y
- 59.26%
- 3Y*
- 31.68%
- 5Y*
- 23.91%
- 10Y*
- 21.03%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
MAR vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 30.26% | 12.31% | 24.92% | 53.06% | -9.34% | 25.26% | -12.53% | 41.49% | -19.05% | 66.24% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAR and KMB is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 1993 | 0.24 |
The correlation between MAR and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (10 years) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MAR:
$12.66
KMB:
$5.93
MAR:
31.80
KMB:
17.26
MAR:
0.83
KMB:
2.98
MAR:
3.78
KMB:
2.06
MAR:
$21.73B
KMB:
$16.54B
MAR:
$1.31B
KMB:
$5.93B
MAR:
$3.81B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAR vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
MAR
KMB
MAR vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAR | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.87 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | -0.67 | +4.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.89 | -1.03 | +11.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAR vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAR drawdown since its inception was -75.59%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAR and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAR | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.59% | -36.97% | -38.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.65% | -29.60% | +16.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.50% | -34.06% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.50% | -34.06% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.26% | -34.06% | -27.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -26.52% | +26.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -8.85% | -6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 19.43% | -14.42% |
Volatility
MAR vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) is 6.92%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that MAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAR | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | 8.42% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 16.67% | +3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.32% | 25.77% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.84% | 20.19% | +8.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.90% | 21.07% | +11.83% |
Dividends
MAR vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than KMB's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.86% | 0.87% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 0.95% | 1.39% | 1.42% |
Financials
MAR vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marriott International, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MAR and KMB have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to MAR (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAR dropped -75.59% vs KMB's -36.97%.
MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAR and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer