KMB vs. VOO
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 1.74%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for VOO. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KMB vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 1.74%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -4.72%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- -12.23%
- 3Y*
- -1.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.50%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.90%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $325.44M | $393.74M | $451.43M | |
| $3.82B | $3.78B | $5.44B |
KMB vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 11.19% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.16% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and VOO is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.34 |
The correlation between KMB and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
VOO
KMB vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.28 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 2.21 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 9.44 | -9.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -33.99% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -8.90% | -20.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -18.69% | -15.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -24.52% | -9.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -33.99% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.48% | -1.38% | -20.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -3.67% | -5.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.31% | 2.08% | +18.23% |
Volatility
KMB vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 8.53% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.53% | 3.54% | +4.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.63% | 10.10% | +8.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.16% | 12.82% | +14.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 16.93% | +3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 18.01% | +3.24% |
Dividends
KMB vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.65% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.07% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and VOO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer