PortfoliosLab logo
KMB vs. CL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between KMB and CL is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

KMB vs. CL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KMB:

0.31

CL:

-0.15

Sortino Ratio

KMB:

0.42

CL:

-0.07

Omega Ratio

KMB:

1.06

CL:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

KMB:

0.30

CL:

-0.15

Martin Ratio

KMB:

0.65

CL:

-0.26

Ulcer Index

KMB:

6.70%

CL:

11.66%

Daily Std Dev

KMB:

19.60%

CL:

20.41%

Max Drawdown

KMB:

-39.69%

CL:

-58.90%

Current Drawdown

KMB:

-6.82%

CL:

-16.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KMB:

$44.30B

CL:

$70.97B

EPS

KMB:

$7.34

CL:

$3.53

PE Ratio

KMB:

18.19

CL:

24.81

PEG Ratio

KMB:

5.91

CL:

1.91

PS Ratio

KMB:

2.24

CL:

3.56

PB Ratio

KMB:

40.39

CL:

196.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

KMB:

$19.75B

CL:

$19.95B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KMB:

$7.00B

CL:

$12.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

KMB:

$3.93B

CL:

$4.82B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly higher than CL's -0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 5.53%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.15% annualized return.


KMB

YTD

5.75%

1M

-2.91%

6M

6.17%

1Y

6.06%

5Y*

3.36%

10Y*

5.53%

CL

YTD

-0.29%

1M

-4.38%

6M

-0.88%

1Y

-3.14%

5Y*

7.90%

10Y*

5.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KMB vs. CL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KMB is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KMB is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KMB is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KMB is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KMB is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KMB is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

CL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CL is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CL is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CL is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CL is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CL is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CL is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KMB vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the CL Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMB and CL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

KMB vs. CL - Dividend Comparison

KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than CL's 2.25% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
3.58%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%0.73%
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.25%2.18%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%2.05%

Drawdowns

KMB vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, smaller than the maximum CL drawdown of -58.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and CL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

KMB vs. CL - Volatility Comparison

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 6.57%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

KMB vs. CL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.80B4.00B4.20B4.40B4.60B4.80B5.00B5.20B20212022202320242025
4.84B
4.91B
(KMB) Total Revenue
(CL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KMB vs. CL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Colgate-Palmolive Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
35.8%
60.8%
(KMB) Gross Margin
(CL) Gross Margin
KMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.

CL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 2.99B and revenue of 4.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.8%.

KMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 769.00M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

CL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.9%.

KMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 567.00M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.

CL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 690.00M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.