KMB vs. CL
Compare and contrast key facts about Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KMB or CL.
Key characteristics
| KMB | CL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.40% | 15.52% |
| 1Y Return | -4.07% | 19.70% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.20% | 7.61% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.95% | 7.55% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.85% | 5.55% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.13 | 1.51 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.41% | 14.32% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.92% | -67.62% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.07% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
| KMB | CL | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $42.73B | $71.62B |
| EPS | $5.21 | $2.77 |
| PE Ratio | 24.34 | 31.45 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.57 | 2.15 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.43B | $19.46B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $6.22B | $10.25B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $3.62B | $4.51B |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and CL is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
KMB vs. CL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 12.40% return, which is significantly lower than CL's 15.52% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 5.85%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.55% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KMB vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KMB vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than CL's 2.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 3.52% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% | 2.73% | 2.97% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.13% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% | 2.05% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
KMB vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, smaller than the maximum CL drawdown of -67.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and CL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KMB vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 3.68%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
KMB vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities