PortfoliosLab logo
KMB vs. AMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between KMB and AMT is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

KMB vs. AMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KMB:

0.12

AMT:

0.47

Sortino Ratio

KMB:

0.21

AMT:

0.89

Omega Ratio

KMB:

1.03

AMT:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

KMB:

0.08

AMT:

0.40

Martin Ratio

KMB:

0.17

AMT:

1.16

Ulcer Index

KMB:

6.70%

AMT:

12.51%

Daily Std Dev

KMB:

19.41%

AMT:

27.72%

Max Drawdown

KMB:

-39.69%

AMT:

-98.70%

Current Drawdown

KMB:

-9.42%

AMT:

-24.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KMB:

$44.47B

AMT:

$95.48B

EPS

KMB:

$7.34

AMT:

$6.18

PE Ratio

KMB:

18.26

AMT:

33.00

PEG Ratio

KMB:

5.86

AMT:

51.64

PS Ratio

KMB:

2.25

AMT:

9.38

PB Ratio

KMB:

40.10

AMT:

27.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

KMB:

$19.75B

AMT:

$10.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KMB:

$7.00B

AMT:

$7.21B

EBITDA (TTM)

KMB:

$3.93B

AMT:

$7.45B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly lower than AMT's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed AMT with an annualized return of 5.25%, while AMT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.49% annualized return.


KMB

YTD

2.79%

1M

-6.35%

6M

2.81%

1Y

2.34%

5Y*

2.77%

10Y*

5.25%

AMT

YTD

12.42%

1M

-6.10%

6M

6.59%

1Y

13.00%

5Y*

0.39%

10Y*

10.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KMB vs. AMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KMB is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KMB is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KMB is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KMB is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KMB is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KMB is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

AMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMT is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMT is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMT is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMT is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMT is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMT is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KMB vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the AMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMB and AMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

KMB vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison

KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than AMT's 3.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
3.69%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%0.73%
AMT
American Tower Corporation
3.21%3.53%2.99%2.77%1.78%2.02%1.64%1.99%1.84%2.05%1.87%1.42%

Drawdowns

KMB vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and AMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

KMB vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 6.52%, while American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

KMB vs. AMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and American Tower Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
4.84B
2.56B
(KMB) Total Revenue
(AMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KMB vs. AMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and American Tower Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
35.8%
75.2%
(KMB) Gross Margin
(AMT) Gross Margin
KMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.

AMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, American Tower Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.93B and revenue of 2.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.2%.

KMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 769.00M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

AMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, American Tower Corporation reported an operating income of 1.25B and revenue of 2.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.9%.

KMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 567.00M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.

AMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, American Tower Corporation reported a net income of 488.70M and revenue of 2.56B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.