KMB vs. AMT
Compare and contrast key facts about Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and American Tower Corporation (AMT).
Performance
KMB vs. AMT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KMB vs. AMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | -3.20% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
AMT American Tower Corporation | -1.70% | -0.92% | -12.16% | 5.37% | -25.67% | 32.89% | -0.48% | 47.87% | 13.32% | 37.71% |
Fundamentals
KMB:
$32.13B
AMT:
$80.96B
KMB:
$6.06
AMT:
$5.40
KMB:
15.91
AMT:
31.99
KMB:
2.75
AMT:
9.12
KMB:
1.87
AMT:
7.60
KMB:
19.71
AMT:
22.17
KMB:
$17.22B
AMT:
$10.65B
KMB:
$6.13B
AMT:
$7.84B
KMB:
$3.14B
AMT:
$6.41B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a -3.20% return, which is significantly lower than AMT's -1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed AMT with an annualized return of 0.01%, while AMT has yielded a comparatively higher 7.75% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -12.36%
- YTD
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -20.50%
- 1Y
- -29.15%
- 3Y*
- -6.89%
- 5Y*
- -3.23%
- 10Y*
- 0.01%
AMT
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -10.05%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- -9.39%
- 1Y
- -17.91%
- 3Y*
- -2.23%
- 5Y*
- -3.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. AMT — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
AMT
KMB vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KMB | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | -0.72 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | -0.88 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.89 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.64 | -0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | -1.06 | -0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KMB | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.17 | -0.72 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | -0.14 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | 0.30 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.20 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and AMT is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KMB vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than AMT's 3.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 5.25% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
AMT American Tower Corporation | 3.94% | 3.87% | 3.53% | 2.99% | 2.77% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
KMB vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and AMT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -98.70% | +61.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.70% | -26.67% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.73% | -45.34% | +13.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.73% | -45.34% | +13.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.64% | -34.82% | +3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -26.99% | +18.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.99% | 16.20% | +2.79% |
Volatility
KMB vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 6.74%, while American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 7.17% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.02% | 17.58% | +3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.96% | 25.02% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 26.01% | -6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 25.98% | -5.15% |
Financials
KMB vs. AMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and American Tower Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. AMT - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 4.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.
AMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, American Tower Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94B and revenue of 2.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.7%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 507.00M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.
AMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, American Tower Corporation reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 499.00M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
AMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, American Tower Corporation reported a net income of 821.00M and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in a net margin of 30.0%.