KMB vs. AMT
Compare and contrast key facts about Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and American Tower Corporation (AMT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KMB or AMT.
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and AMT is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KMB vs. AMT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KMB:
0.71
AMT:
-0.49
KMB:
1.04
AMT:
-0.54
KMB:
1.16
AMT:
0.93
KMB:
0.75
AMT:
-0.31
KMB:
3.08
AMT:
-1.10
KMB:
4.16%
AMT:
11.12%
KMB:
18.03%
AMT:
24.68%
KMB:
-39.69%
AMT:
-98.70%
KMB:
-9.89%
AMT:
-35.11%
Fundamentals
KMB:
$43.73B
AMT:
$90.31B
KMB:
$7.72
AMT:
$4.15
KMB:
16.99
AMT:
46.57
KMB:
2.73
AMT:
1.20
KMB:
$20.10B
AMT:
$11.04B
KMB:
$7.24B
AMT:
$6.09B
KMB:
$4.09B
AMT:
$6.91B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 12.14% return, which is significantly higher than AMT's -14.84% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed AMT with an annualized return of 4.65%, while AMT has yielded a comparatively higher 8.34% annualized return.
KMB
12.14%
-2.20%
-4.57%
14.69%
2.51%
4.65%
AMT
-14.84%
-10.81%
-6.93%
-12.23%
-2.21%
8.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KMB vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KMB vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than AMT's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 3.71% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% | 0.73% | 0.00% |
AMT American Tower Corporation | 3.66% | 2.99% | 2.77% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 1.87% | 1.42% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
KMB vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and AMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KMB vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 4.10%, while American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
KMB vs. AMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and American Tower Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities