PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KMB vs. AMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


KMBAMT
YTD Return7.15%-19.47%
1Y Return-5.43%-12.57%
3Y Return (Ann)2.84%-9.71%
5Y Return (Ann)4.18%0.11%
10Y Return (Ann)5.53%9.96%
Sharpe Ratio-0.24-0.52
Daily Std Dev15.49%25.43%
Max Drawdown-36.92%-98.70%
Current Drawdown-8.54%-38.64%

Fundamentals


KMBAMT
Market Cap$42.73B$79.99B
EPS$5.21$3.19
PE Ratio24.3453.70
PEG Ratio1.571.40
Revenue (TTM)$20.43B$11.14B
Gross Profit (TTM)$6.22B$7.45B
EBITDA (TTM)$3.62B$6.90B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between KMB and AMT is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

KMB vs. AMT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly higher than AMT's -19.47% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed AMT with an annualized return of 5.53%, while AMT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%1,600.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
454.39%
1,179.21%
KMB
AMT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Kimberly-Clark Corporation

American Tower Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KMB vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KMB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KMB, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.24
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for KMB, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for KMB, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.97
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for KMB, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.20
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for KMB, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.31
AMT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMT, currently valued at -0.52, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.52
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMT, currently valued at -0.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.63
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.93
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMT, currently valued at -0.29, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AMT, currently valued at -1.22, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.22

KMB vs. AMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMB Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is higher than the AMT Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of KMB and AMT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.50NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-0.24
-0.52
KMB
AMT

Dividends

KMB vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison

KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than AMT's 3.78% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
3.69%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%2.73%2.97%
AMT
American Tower Corporation
3.78%2.99%2.77%1.78%2.02%1.64%1.99%1.84%2.05%1.87%1.42%1.38%

Drawdowns

KMB vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and AMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-8.54%
-38.64%
KMB
AMT

Volatility

KMB vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 4.37%, while American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
4.37%
7.99%
KMB
AMT

Financials

KMB vs. AMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and American Tower Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items