PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KMB vs. AMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

KMB vs. AMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.08%
4.05%
KMB
AMT

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 13.36% return, which is significantly higher than AMT's -6.75% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed AMT with an annualized return of 5.18%, while AMT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.37% annualized return.


KMB

YTD

13.36%

1M

-7.80%

6M

1.57%

1Y

14.75%

5Y (annualized)

3.66%

10Y (annualized)

5.18%

AMT

YTD

-6.75%

1M

-13.19%

6M

2.58%

1Y

2.61%

5Y (annualized)

0.69%

10Y (annualized)

9.37%

Fundamentals


KMBAMT
Market Cap$44.07B$90.52B
EPS$7.72$4.16
PE Ratio17.1246.57
PEG Ratio2.771.24
Total Revenue (TTM)$20.10B$11.04B
Gross Profit (TTM)$7.24B$6.09B
EBITDA (TTM)$4.21B$6.65B

Key characteristics


KMBAMT
Sharpe Ratio0.790.15
Sortino Ratio1.140.37
Omega Ratio1.171.05
Calmar Ratio0.840.09
Martin Ratio4.080.36
Ulcer Index3.49%9.91%
Daily Std Dev18.17%23.95%
Max Drawdown-39.69%-98.70%
Current Drawdown-8.91%-28.95%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between KMB and AMT is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KMB vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KMB, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.790.08
The chart of Sortino ratio for KMB, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.140.28
The chart of Omega ratio for KMB, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.171.04
The chart of Calmar ratio for KMB, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.840.05
The chart of Martin ratio for KMB, currently valued at 4.08, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.080.19
KMB
AMT

The current KMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the AMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMB and AMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.79
0.08
KMB
AMT

Dividends

KMB vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison

KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than AMT's 3.34% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
3.61%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%0.73%0.00%
AMT
American Tower Corporation
3.34%2.99%2.77%1.78%2.02%1.64%1.99%1.84%2.05%1.87%1.42%1.38%

Drawdowns

KMB vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and AMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.91%
-28.95%
KMB
AMT

Volatility

KMB vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 5.91%, while American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a volatility of 10.28%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.91%
10.28%
KMB
AMT

Financials

KMB vs. AMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and American Tower Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items