KMB vs. PG
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 0.87%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for PG. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 4.56% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 0.87%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 3.37%
- 1Y
- -17.83%
- 3Y*
- -6.09%
- 5Y*
- -1.36%
- 10Y*
- 0.87%
PG
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 5.02%
- 1Y
- -4.50%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
KMB vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 2.23% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 4.56% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and PG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.48 |
The correlation between KMB and PG shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KMB:
$33.49B
PG:
$356.87B
KMB:
$5.93
PG:
$5.23
KMB:
16.96
PG:
28.26
KMB:
2.93
PG:
6.91
KMB:
2.02
PG:
4.14
KMB:
18.65
PG:
6.61
KMB:
$16.54B
PG:
$86.72B
KMB:
$5.93B
PG:
$43.64B
KMB:
$3.07B
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
PG
KMB vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.98 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | -0.29 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | -0.53 | -0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -54.25% | +17.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -15.52% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -21.15% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -23.77% | -10.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -23.77% | -10.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.81% | -14.41% | -13.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -12.16% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.63% | 8.46% | +11.17% |
Volatility
KMB vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 9.21% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 7.38%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.21% | 7.38% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.09% | 14.98% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.95% | 18.83% | +7.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 17.84% | +2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 19.08% | +2.03% |
Dividends
KMB vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than PG's 2.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 5.05% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.88% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
KMB vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and PG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to PG (7.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs PG's -54.25%.
PG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer