PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUN.TO vs. FM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUN.TO vs. FM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) and First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUN.TO achieves a 28.54% return, which is significantly higher than FM.TO's 17.91% return. Over the past 10 years, LUN.TO has outperformed FM.TO with an annualized return of 27.86%, while FM.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.37% annualized return.


LUN.TO

1D
2.69%
1M
-9.84%
YTD
28.54%
6M
39.35%
1Y
171.40%
3Y*
58.49%
5Y*
28.07%
10Y*
27.86%

FM.TO

1D
2.77%
1M
16.58%
YTD
17.91%
6M
30.46%
1Y
107.01%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
18.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUN.TO vs. FM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corporation
28.54%141.86%17.72%35.67%-11.74%-9.34%49.12%40.12%-31.40%32.67%
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
17.91%98.60%70.78%-61.41%-5.96%32.52%73.68%19.40%-37.27%32.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LUN.TO and FM.TO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.63

The correlation between LUN.TO and FM.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUN.TO:

CA$32.59B

FM.TO:

CA$36.11B

EPS

LUN.TO:

$1.69

FM.TO:

-$0.24

PS Ratio

LUN.TO:

5.76

FM.TO:

4.76

PB Ratio

LUN.TO:

3.40

FM.TO:

2.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUN.TO:

$4.04B

FM.TO:

$5.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUN.TO:

$1.55B

FM.TO:

$1.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

LUN.TO:

$1.92B

FM.TO:

$1.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUN.TO vs. FM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUN.TO
LUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FM.TO
FM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUN.TO vs. FM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) and First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LUN.TOFM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.34

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.12

3.55

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.75

10.27

+6.48

LUN.TO vs. FM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the FM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUN.TO and FM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LUN.TO vs. FM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FM.TO drawdown of -90.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUN.TO and FM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUN.TOFM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.33%

-90.98%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.67%

-30.35%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.11%

-75.27%

+28.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.91%

-78.27%

+24.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.61%

-78.27%

+20.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.62%

-5.94%

-8.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.73%

-38.62%

-10.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.28%

10.46%

-0.18%

Volatility

LUN.TO vs. FM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) is 19.93%, while First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) has a volatility of 21.17%. This indicates that LUN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUN.TOFM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.93%

21.17%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.51%

40.43%

+4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.84%

47.81%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.24%

57.78%

-11.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.96%

60.30%

-14.34%

Dividends

LUN.TO vs. FM.TO - Dividend Comparison

LUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while FM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.94%0.58%0.03%0.04%0.08%0.09%0.06%0.11%1.58%
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corporation
0.29%0.68%3.64%3.32%5.66%3.95%1.42%1.55%2.13%1.44%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LUN.TO vs. FM.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Mining Corporation and First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.16B
1.40B
(LUN.TO) Total Revenue
(FM.TO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LUN.TO vs. FM.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lundin Mining Corporation and First Quantum Minerals Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
46.4%
19.8%
Portfolio components
LUN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 537.50M and revenue of 1.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.

FM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Quantum Minerals Ltd. reported a gross profit of 278.00M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.

LUN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 503.80M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.5%.

FM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Quantum Minerals Ltd. reported an operating income of 190.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.5%.

LUN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 281.40M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.

FM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Quantum Minerals Ltd. reported a net income of -196.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -14.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LUN.TO and FM.TO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUN.TO and FM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer