LUN.TO vs. STRL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LUN.TO (Lundin Mining Corporation) and STRL (Sterling Construction Company, Inc.) are both stocks. LUN.TO operates in Copper (Basic Materials), while STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LUN.TO returned 28.49%/yr vs 69.68%/yr for STRL. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LUN.TO vs. STRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LUN.TO is traded in CAD, while STRL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the STRL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUN.TO achieves a 43.49% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 216.50% return. Over the past 10 years, LUN.TO has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 28.49%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 69.68% annualized return.

LUN.TO

• 1D: -4.10%
• 1M: 25.90%
• YTD: 43.49%
• 6M: 58.11%
• 1Y: 215.52%
• 3Y*: 64.72%
• 5Y*: 30.96%
• 10Y*: 28.49%

STRL

• 1D: 9.76%
• 1M: 84.35%
• YTD: 216.50%
• 6M: 194.73%
• 1Y: 399.09%
• 3Y*: 172.07%
• 5Y*: 113.07%
• 10Y*: 69.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUN.TO vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation	43.49%	141.31%	17.72%	35.67%	-11.74%	-9.34%	49.12%	40.12%	-31.40%	32.67%
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc.	216.50%	73.45%	108.03%	162.17%	33.60%	40.04%	29.94%	22.94%	-27.44%	80.18%

Correlation

The correlation between LUN.TO and STRL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009	0.18

The correlation between LUN.TO and STRL shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LUN.TO : CA$36.40B STRL : $29.70B
EPS LUN.TO : CA$1.69 STRL : $11.19
PE Ratio LUN.TO : 25.05 STRL : 85.53
PEG Ratio LUN.TO : 0.15 STRL : 1.82
PS Ratio LUN.TO : 9.00 STRL : 10.28
PB Ratio LUN.TO : 5.31 STRL : 24.97
Total Revenue (TTM) LUN.TO : CA$4.04B STRL : $2.88B
Gross Profit (TTM) LUN.TO : CA$1.55B STRL : $664.66M
EBITDA (TTM) LUN.TO : CA$1.92B STRL : $429.99M

Return for Risk

LUN.TO vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUN.TO

LUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 95
LUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
LUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
LUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

STRL

STRL Risk / Return Rank: 97
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUN.TO vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LUN.TO	STRL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.24	5.01	-0.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.07	4.76	-0.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.63	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.44	12.34	-5.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.68	34.68	-13.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LUN.TO vs. STRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.24, which is comparable to the STRL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUN.TO and STRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LUN.TO	STRL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.24	5.01	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	2.04	-1.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	1.33	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.60	-0.60

Drawdowns

LUN.TO vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.33%, which is greater than STRL's maximum drawdown of -86.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUN.TO and STRL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LUN.TO	STRL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.33%	-86.05%	-9.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.67%	-32.60%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.11%	-48.22%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.91%	-48.22%	-5.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.61%	-55.68%	-1.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.69%	0.00%	-4.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.28%	-31.56%	-16.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.99%	11.58%	-1.59%

Volatility

LUN.TO vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) is 16.29%, while Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 47.69%. This indicates that LUN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LUN.TO	STRL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.29%	47.69%	-31.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.34%	62.08%	-19.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.12%	80.24%	-29.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.86%	55.94%	-10.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.78%	52.46%	-6.68%

Dividends

LUN.TO vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison

LUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation	0.26%	0.59%	3.64%	3.32%	5.66%	3.95%	1.42%	1.55%	2.13%	1.44%
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

LUN.TO vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lundin Mining Corporation and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LUN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 537.50M and revenue of 1.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.

STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.

LUN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 503.80M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.5%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

LUN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 281.40M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LUN.TO and STRL in my portfolio?

LUN.TO and STRL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.