PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUN.TO vs. IPO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

LUN.TO vs. IPO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) and InPlay Oil Corp. (IPO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LUN.TO vs. IPO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corporation
19.23%141.31%17.72%35.67%-11.74%-9.34%49.12%40.12%-31.40%32.67%
IPO.TO
InPlay Oil Corp.
41.16%32.50%-14.79%-21.88%40.32%847.83%-65.15%-32.65%-49.48%-2.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUN.TO:

CA$30.08B

IPO.TO:

CA$479.13M

EPS

LUN.TO:

CA$1.51

IPO.TO:

-CA$0.28

PS Ratio

LUN.TO:

7.85

IPO.TO:

1.68

PB Ratio

LUN.TO:

4.55

IPO.TO:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUN.TO:

CA$3.84B

IPO.TO:

CA$280.83M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUN.TO:

CA$1.46B

IPO.TO:

CA$117.24M

EBITDA (TTM)

LUN.TO:

CA$1.72B

IPO.TO:

CA$103.73M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUN.TO achieves a 19.23% return, which is significantly lower than IPO.TO's 41.16% return. Over the past 10 years, LUN.TO has underperformed IPO.TO with an annualized return of 27.03%, while IPO.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 99.05% annualized return.


LUN.TO

1D
1.30%
1M
-15.84%
YTD
19.23%
6M
70.18%
1Y
199.25%
3Y*
60.22%
5Y*
25.36%
10Y*
27.03%

IPO.TO

1D
-5.24%
1M
7.42%
YTD
41.16%
6M
41.13%
1Y
94.49%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
48.35%
10Y*
99.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUN.TO vs. IPO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUN.TO
LUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

IPO.TO
IPO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IPO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IPO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUN.TO vs. IPO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) and InPlay Oil Corp. (IPO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUN.TOIPO.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.73

2.42

+1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.65

2.94

+0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.37

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.03

2.99

+3.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.86

10.58

+13.28

LUN.TO vs. IPO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is higher than the IPO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUN.TO and IPO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUN.TOIPO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73

2.42

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.96

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.00

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

-0.00

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between LUN.TO and IPO.TO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LUN.TO vs. IPO.TO - Dividend Comparison

LUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than IPO.TO's 6.28% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corporation
0.32%0.59%3.64%3.32%5.66%3.95%1.42%1.55%2.13%1.44%
IPO.TO
InPlay Oil Corp.
6.28%8.71%10.40%8.14%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LUN.TO vs. IPO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.33%, roughly equal to the maximum IPO.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUN.TO and IPO.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LUN.TOIPO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.33%

-100.00%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.67%

-32.04%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.61%

-72.62%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.61%

-97.78%

+40.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.80%

-95.10%

+74.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.47%

-92.37%

+43.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.51%

9.04%

-0.53%

Volatility

LUN.TO vs. IPO.TO - Volatility Comparison

Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.11% compared to InPlay Oil Corp. (IPO.TO) at 11.91%. This indicates that LUN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LUN.TOIPO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.11%

11.91%

+9.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.84%

23.56%

+17.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.74%

39.27%

+14.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.39%

50.94%

-5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.83%

40,403.68%

-40,357.85%

Financials

LUN.TO vs. IPO.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Mining Corporation and InPlay Oil Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
989.48M
70.91M
(LUN.TO) Total Revenue
(IPO.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

LUN.TO vs. IPO.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lundin Mining Corporation and InPlay Oil Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
29.5%
10.6%
Portfolio components
LUN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.61M and revenue of 989.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.5%.

IPO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InPlay Oil Corp. reported a gross profit of 7.52M and revenue of 70.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.6%.

LUN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 278.62M and revenue of 989.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.

IPO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InPlay Oil Corp. reported an operating income of 2.23M and revenue of 70.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

LUN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 779.09M and revenue of 989.48M, resulting in a net margin of 78.7%.

IPO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InPlay Oil Corp. reported a net income of 3.04M and revenue of 70.91M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.