PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FM.TO vs. ^TNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index (^TNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FM.TO is traded in CAD, while ^TNX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^TNX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FM.TO achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than ^TNX's 13.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FM.TO has outperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of 14.36%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.12% annualized return.


FM.TO

1D
2.17%
1M
-12.60%
6M
-8.32%
YTD
2.15%
1Y
60.71%
3Y*
2.65%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
14.36%
ALL TIME*
6.04%

^TNX

1D
1.13%
1M
2.71%
6M
9.70%
YTD
13.07%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
8.44%
5Y*
31.77%
10Y*
12.12%
ALL TIME*
0.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
2.15%98.60%70.78%-61.41%-5.96%32.52%73.68%19.40%-37.27%32.00%
^TNX
Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index
13.07%-13.12%28.30%-2.71%172.80%64.80%-53.35%-31.50%21.07%-8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FM.TO and ^TNX is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2006

0.16

The correlation between FM.TO and ^TNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FM.TO vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FM.TO
FM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

^TNX
^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FM.TO^TNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.07

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

0.56

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.36

1.23

+4.13

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FM.TO and ^TNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FM.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.98%, roughly equal to the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -89.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FM.TO and ^TNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FM.TO^TNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.98%

-89.94%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.35%

-10.53%

-19.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.27%

-28.13%

-47.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.27%

-28.13%

-50.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.27%

-83.97%

+5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.51%

-6.90%

-11.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.66%

-44.63%

+5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.35%

5.15%

+6.20%

Volatility

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.77% compared to Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index (^TNX) at 4.38%. This indicates that FM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FM.TO^TNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.77%

4.38%

+14.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.76%

11.80%

+31.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.64%

15.46%

+35.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.98%

32.06%

+25.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.07%

48.34%

+11.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


FM.TO and ^TNX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FM.TO and ^TNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer