FM.TO vs. ^TNX
FM.TO (First Quantum Minerals Ltd.) is a stock, while ^TNX (Treasury Yield 10 Years) is an index. Over the past 10 years, FM.TO returned 17.54%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for ^TNX. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FM.TO is traded in CAD, while ^TNX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^TNX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FM.TO achieves a 23.10% return, which is significantly higher than ^TNX's 9.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FM.TO has outperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of 17.54%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.97% annualized return.
FM.TO
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- 45.94%
- YTD
- 23.10%
- 6M
- 36.61%
- 1Y
- 118.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 17.54%
^TNX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 1.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 27.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FM.TO First Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 23.10% | 98.60% | 70.78% | -61.41% | -5.96% | 32.52% | 73.68% | 19.40% | -37.27% | 32.00% |
^TNX Treasury Yield 10 Years | 9.25% | -13.14% | 28.45% | -2.53% | 174.83% | 63.40% | -53.02% | -32.07% | 21.16% | -7.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between FM.TO and ^TNX is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.11 |
The correlation between FM.TO and ^TNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FM.TO vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank
FM.TO
^TNX
FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FM.TO | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.03 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 0.16 | +3.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.49 | 0.32 | +11.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FM.TO | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 0.12 | +2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.82 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.23 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.05 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FM.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.98%, which is greater than ^TNX's maximum drawdown of -83.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FM.TO and ^TNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FM.TO | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.98% | -83.97% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.35% | -12.47% | -17.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.27% | -28.10% | -47.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.27% | -28.10% | -50.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.27% | -83.93% | +5.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -9.63% | +7.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.71% | -32.52% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.32% | 6.24% | +4.08% |
Volatility
FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.33% compared to Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) at 5.28%. This indicates that FM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FM.TO | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.33% | 5.28% | +10.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.91% | 11.60% | +26.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.56% | 17.01% | +28.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.45% | 33.42% | +24.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.32% | 48.26% | +12.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FM.TO and ^TNX have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FM.TO and ^TNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer