PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FM.TO vs. HBM.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FM.TOHBM.TO
YTD Return74.01%64.70%
1Y Return20.64%111.38%
3Y Return (Ann)-12.45%9.38%
5Y Return (Ann)10.83%22.47%
10Y Return (Ann)1.05%3.58%
Sharpe Ratio0.272.46
Sortino Ratio0.853.11
Omega Ratio1.101.38
Calmar Ratio0.201.41
Martin Ratio0.948.57
Ulcer Index16.99%12.95%
Daily Std Dev58.70%45.18%
Max Drawdown-90.98%-96.48%
Current Drawdown-57.49%-54.77%

Fundamentals


FM.TOHBM.TO
Market CapCA$15.75BCA$4.72B
EPS-CA$3.08CA$0.38
PEG Ratio-9.802.09
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$3.49BCA$1.55B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$576.00MCA$426.34M
EBITDA (TTM)CA$720.00MCA$593.21M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between FM.TO and HBM.TO is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FM.TO vs. HBM.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FM.TO achieves a 74.01% return, which is significantly higher than HBM.TO's 64.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FM.TO has underperformed HBM.TO with an annualized return of 1.05%, while HBM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 3.58% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.97%
-13.53%
FM.TO
HBM.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FM.TO vs. HBM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FM.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.25
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.89
HBM.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HBM.TO, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.30
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HBM.TO, currently valued at 2.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.95
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HBM.TO, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HBM.TO, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HBM.TO, currently valued at 8.29, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.29

FM.TO vs. HBM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the HBM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FM.TO and HBM.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.25
2.30
FM.TO
HBM.TO

Dividends

FM.TO vs. HBM.TO - Dividend Comparison

FM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
0.00%1.94%0.58%0.03%0.04%0.08%0.09%0.06%0.11%1.58%0.87%0.90%
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
0.17%0.27%0.29%0.22%0.22%0.37%0.31%0.18%0.26%0.38%0.20%1.26%

Drawdowns

FM.TO vs. HBM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FM.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.98%, smaller than the maximum HBM.TO drawdown of -96.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FM.TO and HBM.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-61.92%
-67.66%
FM.TO
HBM.TO

Volatility

FM.TO vs. HBM.TO - Volatility Comparison

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.63% compared to Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO) at 14.86%. This indicates that FM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.63%
14.86%
FM.TO
HBM.TO

Financials

FM.TO vs. HBM.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Quantum Minerals Ltd. and Hudbay Minerals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items