FM.TO vs. FSAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX).
FSAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985.
Performance
FM.TO vs. FSAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FM.TO vs. FSAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FM.TO First Quantum Minerals Ltd. | -5.19% | 98.60% | 70.78% | -61.41% | -5.96% | 32.52% | 73.68% | 19.40% | -37.27% | 32.00% |
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 10.64% | 131.90% | 24.85% | -2.56% | -7.29% | -11.25% | 24.69% | 28.84% | -5.62% | 1.71% |
Different Trading Currencies
FM.TO is traded in CAD, while FSAGX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FSAGX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FM.TO achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than FSAGX's 10.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FM.TO has outperformed FSAGX with an annualized return of 17.96%, while FSAGX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.61% annualized return.
FM.TO
- 1D
- 4.90%
- 1M
- -13.17%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- 9.82%
- 1Y
- 71.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 17.96%
FSAGX
- 1D
- 7.10%
- 1M
- -18.67%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 21.52%
- 1Y
- 92.51%
- 3Y*
- 40.99%
- 5Y*
- 23.53%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FM.TO vs. FSAGX — Risk / Return Rank
FM.TO
FSAGX
FM.TO vs. FSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FM.TO | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 2.23 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 2.46 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.37 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 3.16 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 11.84 | -3.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FM.TO | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 2.23 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.78 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.50 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.23 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FM.TO and FSAGX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FM.TO vs. FSAGX - Dividend Comparison
FM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FM.TO First Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.94% | 0.58% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 1.58% |
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 1.99% | 2.17% | 3.62% | 0.99% | 0.36% | 1.60% | 4.40% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 3.57% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FM.TO vs. FSAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FM.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.98%, which is greater than FSAGX's maximum drawdown of -68.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FM.TO and FSAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FM.TO | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.98% | -77.21% | -13.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.35% | -29.85% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.27% | -45.94% | -32.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.27% | -50.57% | -27.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.44% | -20.11% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.83% | -33.41% | -3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.84% | 8.05% | +1.79% |
Volatility
FM.TO vs. FSAGX - Volatility Comparison
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.92% compared to Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) at 17.19%. This indicates that FM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FM.TO | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.92% | 17.19% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.32% | 34.68% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.07% | 41.30% | +6.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.56% | 30.23% | +27.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.39% | 31.02% | +30.37% |