PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FM.TO vs. AEM.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FM.TOAEM.TO
YTD Return65.35%48.57%
1Y Return15.89%64.37%
3Y Return (Ann)-13.92%16.83%
5Y Return (Ann)8.71%8.75%
10Y Return (Ann)0.54%15.90%
Sharpe Ratio0.252.47
Sortino Ratio0.823.09
Omega Ratio1.091.40
Calmar Ratio0.191.62
Martin Ratio0.8612.75
Ulcer Index17.01%5.38%
Daily Std Dev58.79%27.80%
Max Drawdown-90.98%-84.31%
Current Drawdown-59.60%-13.99%

Fundamentals


FM.TOAEM.TO
Market CapCA$15.75BCA$54.57B
EPS-CA$3.08CA$2.72
PEG Ratio-9.8028.26
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$3.49BCA$7.82B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$576.00MCA$3.18B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$720.00MCA$2.89B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between FM.TO and AEM.TO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FM.TO vs. AEM.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FM.TO achieves a 65.35% return, which is significantly higher than AEM.TO's 48.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FM.TO has underperformed AEM.TO with an annualized return of 0.54%, while AEM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.90% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.25%
10.90%
FM.TO
AEM.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FM.TO vs. AEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FM.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.79
AEM.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 2.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.77
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.51
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 10.90, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0010.90

FM.TO vs. AEM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FM.TO and AEM.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.22
2.22
FM.TO
AEM.TO

Dividends

FM.TO vs. AEM.TO - Dividend Comparison

FM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
0.00%1.94%0.58%0.03%0.04%0.08%0.09%0.06%0.11%1.58%0.87%0.90%
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.50%2.20%2.27%2.71%1.06%0.69%0.80%0.71%0.82%0.88%1.42%3.97%

Drawdowns

FM.TO vs. AEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FM.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.98%, which is greater than AEM.TO's maximum drawdown of -84.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FM.TO and AEM.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-63.96%
-14.49%
FM.TO
AEM.TO

Volatility

FM.TO vs. AEM.TO - Volatility Comparison

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.87% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) at 10.82%. This indicates that FM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.87%
10.82%
FM.TO
AEM.TO

Financials

FM.TO vs. AEM.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Quantum Minerals Ltd. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items