FM.TO vs. POW.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FM.TO or POW.TO.
Key characteristics
FM.TO | POW.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 74.01% | 29.08% |
1Y Return | 20.64% | 45.57% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -12.45% | 9.56% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 10.83% | 14.59% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 1.05% | 10.23% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.27 | 2.78 |
Sortino Ratio | 0.85 | 3.41 |
Omega Ratio | 1.10 | 1.52 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.20 | 3.73 |
Martin Ratio | 0.94 | 13.99 |
Ulcer Index | 16.99% | 3.25% |
Daily Std Dev | 58.70% | 16.34% |
Max Drawdown | -90.98% | -62.40% |
Current Drawdown | -57.49% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
FM.TO | POW.TO | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | CA$15.75B | CA$29.90B |
EPS | -CA$3.08 | CA$4.42 |
PEG Ratio | -9.80 | 0.57 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$3.49B | CA$35.84B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$576.00M | CA$35.84B |
EBITDA (TTM) | CA$720.00M | CA$65.00M |
Correlation
The correlation between FM.TO and POW.TO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FM.TO vs. POW.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FM.TO achieves a 74.01% return, which is significantly higher than POW.TO's 29.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FM.TO has underperformed POW.TO with an annualized return of 1.05%, while POW.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FM.TO vs. POW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FM.TO vs. POW.TO - Dividend Comparison
FM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 0.00% | 1.94% | 0.58% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 1.58% | 0.87% | 0.90% |
Power Corporation of Canada | 4.72% | 5.60% | 6.28% | 4.43% | 7.54% | 4.77% | 6.13% | 4.36% | 4.38% | 4.23% | 3.65% | 3.63% |
Drawdowns
FM.TO vs. POW.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FM.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.98%, which is greater than POW.TO's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FM.TO and POW.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FM.TO vs. POW.TO - Volatility Comparison
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.63% compared to Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) at 3.44%. This indicates that FM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FM.TO vs. POW.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Quantum Minerals Ltd. and Power Corporation of Canada. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities