LUN.TO vs. AGI
Compare and contrast key facts about Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI).
Performance
LUN.TO vs. AGI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LUN.TO vs. AGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 17.70% | 141.31% | 17.72% | 35.67% | -11.74% | -9.34% | 49.12% | 40.12% | -31.40% | 32.67% |
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 16.81% | 100.30% | 49.55% | 31.37% | 42.60% | -11.80% | 44.27% | 60.14% | -39.78% | -10.65% |
Different Trading Currencies
LUN.TO is traded in CAD, while AGI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AGI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
LUN.TO:
CA$29.69B
AGI:
$18.78B
LUN.TO:
CA$1.51
AGI:
$2.10
LUN.TO:
23.02
AGI:
21.12
LUN.TO:
0.14
AGI:
0.14
LUN.TO:
7.75
AGI:
10.36
LUN.TO:
4.49
AGI:
4.23
LUN.TO:
CA$3.84B
AGI:
$1.81B
LUN.TO:
CA$1.46B
AGI:
$984.43M
LUN.TO:
CA$1.72B
AGI:
$1.19B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUN.TO achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than AGI's 9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, LUN.TO has outperformed AGI with an annualized return of 26.87%, while AGI has yielded a comparatively lower 23.92% annualized return.
LUN.TO
- 1D
- 10.72%
- 1M
- -20.11%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 6M
- 67.43%
- 1Y
- 199.22%
- 3Y*
- 59.53%
- 5Y*
- 25.04%
- 10Y*
- 26.87%
AGI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -21.30%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 6M
- 19.94%
- 1Y
- 51.55%
- 3Y*
- 52.87%
- 5Y*
- 42.67%
- 10Y*
- 23.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUN.TO vs. AGI — Risk / Return Rank
LUN.TO
AGI
LUN.TO vs. AGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LUN.TO | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.73 | 1.05 | +2.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.65 | 1.51 | +2.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.20 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.72 | 1.75 | +3.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.91 | 4.65 | +18.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LUN.TO | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 1.05 | +2.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 1.12 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.51 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.28 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between LUN.TO and AGI is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LUN.TO vs. AGI - Dividend Comparison
LUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than AGI's 0.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 0.32% | 0.59% | 3.64% | 3.32% | 5.66% | 3.95% | 1.42% | 1.55% | 2.13% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.26% | 0.26% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.56% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
LUN.TO vs. AGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.33%, which is greater than AGI's maximum drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUN.TO and AGI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUN.TO | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.33% | -88.13% | -7.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.67% | -30.78% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.61% | -30.78% | -26.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.61% | -71.13% | +13.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.82% | -19.63% | -2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.47% | -37.86% | -10.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.41% | 11.25% | -2.84% |
Volatility
LUN.TO vs. AGI - Volatility Comparison
Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) has a higher volatility of 22.19% compared to Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) at 16.60%. This indicates that LUN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LUN.TO | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.19% | 16.60% | +5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.87% | 40.77% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.80% | 49.47% | +4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.41% | 38.51% | +6.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.84% | 47.47% | -1.63% |
Financials
LUN.TO vs. AGI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Mining Corporation and Alamos Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LUN.TO vs. AGI - Profitability Comparison
LUN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.61M and revenue of 989.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.5%.
AGI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 351.22M and revenue of 584.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.1%.
LUN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 278.62M and revenue of 989.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.
AGI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 333.35M and revenue of 584.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.1%.
LUN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 779.09M and revenue of 989.48M, resulting in a net margin of 78.7%.
AGI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 441.58M and revenue of 584.14M, resulting in a net margin of 75.6%.