LUN.TO vs. CCL-B.TO
LUN.TO (Lundin Mining Corporation) and CCL-B.TO (CCL Industries Inc) are both stocks. LUN.TO operates in Copper (Basic Materials), while CCL-B.TO operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, LUN.TO returned 28.49%/yr vs 7.29%/yr for CCL-B.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LUN.TO vs. CCL-B.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUN.TO achieves a 43.49% return, which is significantly higher than CCL-B.TO's -3.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LUN.TO has outperformed CCL-B.TO with an annualized return of 28.49%, while CCL-B.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.29% annualized return.
LUN.TO
- 1D
- -4.10%
- 1M
- 25.90%
- YTD
- 43.49%
- 6M
- 58.11%
- 1Y
- 215.52%
- 3Y*
- 64.72%
- 5Y*
- 30.96%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
CCL-B.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- -3.65%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 7.42%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
LUN.TO vs. CCL-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 43.49% | 141.31% | 17.72% | 35.67% | -11.74% | -9.34% | 49.12% | 40.12% | -31.40% | 32.67% |
CCL-B.TO CCL Industries Inc | -3.65% | 19.18% | 26.04% | 4.84% | -13.35% | 18.83% | 6.04% | 11.82% | -13.08% | 10.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUN.TO and CCL-B.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 1994 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
LUN.TO:
CA$36.40B
CCL-B.TO:
CA$14.48B
LUN.TO:
CA$1.69
CCL-B.TO:
CA$4.58
LUN.TO:
25.05
CCL-B.TO:
18.17
LUN.TO:
0.15
CCL-B.TO:
1.59
LUN.TO:
9.00
CCL-B.TO:
1.88
LUN.TO:
5.31
CCL-B.TO:
2.58
LUN.TO:
CA$4.04B
CCL-B.TO:
CA$7.72B
LUN.TO:
CA$1.55B
CCL-B.TO:
CA$2.31B
LUN.TO:
CA$1.92B
CCL-B.TO:
CA$1.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUN.TO vs. CCL-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LUN.TO
CCL-B.TO
LUN.TO vs. CCL-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) and CCL Industries Inc (CCL-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LUN.TO | CCL-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.08 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.44 | 0.62 | +5.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.68 | 1.34 | +20.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LUN.TO | CCL-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.24 | 0.33 | +3.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.24 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.29 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.41 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
LUN.TO vs. CCL-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.33%, which is greater than CCL-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -61.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUN.TO and CCL-B.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUN.TO | CCL-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.33% | -61.52% | -33.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.67% | -12.02% | -21.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.11% | -21.34% | -25.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.91% | -25.60% | -28.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.61% | -48.19% | -9.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | -11.95% | +7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.28% | -15.71% | -32.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.99% | 5.56% | +4.43% |
Volatility
LUN.TO vs. CCL-B.TO - Volatility Comparison
Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.29% compared to CCL Industries Inc (CCL-B.TO) at 8.36%. This indicates that LUN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCL-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUN.TO | CCL-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.29% | 8.36% | +7.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.34% | 17.72% | +24.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.12% | 22.37% | +28.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.86% | 22.36% | +23.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.78% | 25.62% | +20.16% |
Dividends
LUN.TO vs. CCL-B.TO - Dividend Comparison
LUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than CCL-B.TO's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCL-B.TO CCL Industries Inc | 1.59% | 1.48% | 1.57% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.24% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.04% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.67% |
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 0.26% | 0.59% | 3.64% | 3.32% | 5.66% | 3.95% | 1.42% | 1.55% | 2.13% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LUN.TO vs. CCL-B.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Mining Corporation and CCL Industries Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LUN.TO vs. CCL-B.TO - Profitability Comparison
LUN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 537.50M and revenue of 1.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.
CCL-B.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CCL Industries Inc reported a gross profit of 585.30M and revenue of 1.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.2%.
LUN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 503.80M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.5%.
CCL-B.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CCL Industries Inc reported an operating income of 295.70M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.
LUN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 281.40M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.
CCL-B.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CCL Industries Inc reported a net income of 204.90M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LUN.TO and CCL-B.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LUN.TO and CCL-B.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer