LTL vs. FCOM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM).

LTL and FCOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LTL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%). It was launched on Mar 25, 2008. FCOM is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both LTL and FCOM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LTL vs. FCOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LTL vs. FCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications	-12.80%	37.06%	65.15%	62.03%	-41.14%	40.42%	-3.25%	30.16%	-23.44%	-26.85%
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF	-6.81%	26.06%	33.05%	44.65%	-38.97%	13.88%	28.33%	26.69%	-5.33%	8.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -12.80% return, which is significantly lower than FCOM's -6.81% return. Over the past 10 years, LTL has underperformed FCOM with an annualized return of 9.01%, while FCOM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.00% annualized return.

LTL

• 1D: 5.34%
• 1M: -12.00%
• YTD: -12.80%
• 6M: -14.87%
• 1Y: 22.03%
• 3Y*: 42.86%
• 5Y*: 17.66%
• 10Y*: 9.01%

FCOM

• 1D: 3.51%
• 1M: -6.10%
• YTD: -6.81%
• 6M: -3.57%
• 1Y: 22.27%
• 3Y*: 24.17%
• 5Y*: 7.26%
• 10Y*: 11.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTL vs. FCOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FCOM's 0.08% expense ratio.

LTL

ProShares Ultra Telecommunications

FCOM

Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF

Return for Risk

LTL vs. FCOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTL

LTL Risk / Return Rank: 38
LTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
LTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
LTL Omega Ratio Rank: 38
LTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
LTL Martin Ratio Rank: 37

FCOM

FCOM Risk / Return Rank: 68
FCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTL vs. FCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTL	FCOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	1.10	-0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	1.71	-0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.23	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	1.69	-0.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.33	6.27	-2.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTL vs. FCOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the FCOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTL and FCOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTL	FCOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60	1.10	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.34	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.53	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.55	-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between LTL and FCOM is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LTL vs. FCOM - Dividend Comparison

LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than FCOM's 1.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications	0.93%	0.64%	0.29%	0.97%	2.01%	1.14%	1.57%	0.83%	1.99%	1.96%	0.70%	1.55%
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF	1.00%	0.88%	0.87%	0.77%	1.04%	0.90%	0.68%	0.86%	2.78%	11.70%	2.27%	2.92%

Drawdowns

LTL vs. FCOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, which is greater than FCOM's maximum drawdown of -46.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and FCOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTL	FCOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.20%	-46.76%	-33.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.91%	-13.48%	-8.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.60%	-46.76%	-5.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.15%	-46.76%	-17.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.87%	-9.92%	-5.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.85%	-8.74%	-20.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.19%	3.63%	+3.56%

Volatility

LTL vs. FCOM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) has a higher volatility of 10.36% compared to Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) at 6.37%. This indicates that LTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTL	FCOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.36%	6.37%	+3.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.71%	11.59%	+8.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.87%	20.29%	+16.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.53%	21.21%	+13.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.06%	20.94%	+16.12%