LTL vs. XLK

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LTL (ProShares Ultra Telecommunications) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LTL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%), while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LTL returned 6.41%/yr vs 23.77%/yr for XLK. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LTL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.

Performance

LTL vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -18.73% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 22.09% return. Over the past 10 years, LTL has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 6.41%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 23.77% annualized return.

LTL

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: -3.61%
• 6M: -21.05%
• YTD: -18.73%
• 1Y: -1.62%
• 3Y*: 25.79%
• 5Y*: 14.19%
• 10Y*: 6.41%
• ALL TIME*: 5.81%

XLK

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -2.90%
• 6M: 22.17%
• YTD: 22.09%
• 1Y: 37.14%
• 3Y*: 26.04%
• 5Y*: 18.87%
• 10Y*: 23.77%
• ALL TIME*: 10.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications	$123.54K	$121.65K	$82.18K
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	$1.61B	$1.67B	$2.22B

LTL vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications	-18.73%	37.06%	65.15%	62.03%	-41.14%	40.42%	-3.25%	30.16%	-23.44%	-26.85%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	22.09%	24.61%	21.63%	56.02%	-27.73%	34.74%	43.62%	49.86%	-1.68%	34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between LTL and XLK is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2008	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between LTL and XLK has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LTL vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LTL	XLK
Communication Services	56.2%	0.9%
Technology	6.5%	99.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.2%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LTL vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LTL

LTL Risk / Return Rank: 9
LTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
LTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
LTL Omega Ratio Rank: 9
LTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
LTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8

XLK

XLK Risk / Return Rank: 55
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LTL vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTL	XLK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	1.34	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.01	1.85	-1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.23	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	2.16	-2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.40	5.85	-6.25

LTL vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTL Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTL and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LTL vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, roughly equal to the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and XLK.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTL	XLK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.20%	-82.05%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.25%	-15.92%	-9.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.37%	-25.66%	-8.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.60%	-33.56%	-19.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.15%	-33.56%	-30.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.59%	-11.43%	-10.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.56%	-34.80%	+6.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.42%	5.86%	+4.56%

Volatility

LTL vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) has a higher volatility of 13.00% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 9.58%. This indicates that LTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTL	XLK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.00%	9.58%	+3.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.65%	21.81%	+1.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.78%	25.59%	+4.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.15%	25.75%	+9.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.01%	24.90%	+12.11%

LTL vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTL vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than XLK's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications	1.06%	0.64%	0.29%	0.97%	2.01%	1.14%	1.57%	0.83%	1.99%	1.96%	0.70%	1.55%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	0.45%	0.54%	0.66%	0.76%	1.04%	0.65%	0.92%	1.16%	1.60%	1.37%	1.74%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTL and XLK in my portfolio?

LTL and XLK have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTL or XLK?

LTL has higher volatility (13.00%) compared to XLK (9.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTL dropped -80.20% vs XLK's -82.05%.

Which ETF is better, LTL or XLK?

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 23.77% vs 6.41% for LTL. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 9.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LTL or XLK?

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 23.77% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTL or XLK?

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for LTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTL or XLK?

LTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.45% for XLK.

What is the main difference between LTL and XLK?

LTL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. LTL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%), while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTL and 0.08% for XLK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.