PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTL vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -19.62% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, LTL has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 7.38%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.58% annualized return.


LTL

1D
-4.20%
1M
-14.53%
YTD
-19.62%
6M
-18.20%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
30.89%
5Y*
14.78%
10Y*
7.38%

DGRO

1D
0.08%
1M
0.48%
YTD
8.84%
6M
8.25%
1Y
22.81%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTL vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
-19.62%37.06%65.15%62.03%-41.14%40.42%-3.25%30.16%-23.44%-26.85%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.84%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LTL and DGRO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.54

The correlation between LTL and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LTL vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LTL
DGRO

Communication Services

63.0%
0.1%

Technology

1.1%
22.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

11.1%

Energy

-

5.1%

Financial Services

-

20.6%

Healthcare

-

16.5%

Industrials

-

10.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

6.4%

Communication Services

LTL
63.0%
DGRO
0.1%

Technology

LTL
1.1%
DGRO
22.0%

Basic Materials

LTL

-

DGRO
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

LTL

-

DGRO
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

LTL

-

DGRO
11.1%

Energy

LTL

-

DGRO
5.1%

Financial Services

LTL

-

DGRO
20.6%

Healthcare

LTL

-

DGRO
16.5%

Industrials

LTL

-

DGRO
10.4%

Real Estate

LTL

-

DGRO

-

Utilities

LTL

-

DGRO
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTL vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTL
LTL Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTL Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
LTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTLDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.43

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

3.54

-3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

13.67

-13.31

LTL vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTL and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTLDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.20%

-35.10%

-45.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.45%

-6.47%

-15.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.37%

-14.03%

-20.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.60%

-19.31%

-33.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.15%

-35.10%

-29.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.45%

-1.21%

-21.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.62%

-3.43%

-25.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.11%

1.67%

+6.44%

Volatility

LTL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) has a higher volatility of 9.53% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.64%. This indicates that LTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTLDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.53%

2.64%

+6.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.72%

6.94%

+13.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.45%

9.55%

+17.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.70%

13.80%

+20.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.97%

16.63%

+20.34%

LTL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than DGRO's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.97%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
1.01%0.64%0.29%0.97%2.01%1.14%1.57%0.83%1.99%1.96%0.70%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTL and DGRO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTL has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to DGRO (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTL dropped -80.20% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.58% vs 7.38% for LTL. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for LTL.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.01% for LTL.

LTL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. LTL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%), while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTL and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTL and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer