PortfoliosLab logo
LTL vs. XLC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LTL and XLC is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

LTL vs. XLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LTL:

0.79

XLC:

1.06

Sortino Ratio

LTL:

1.26

XLC:

1.53

Omega Ratio

LTL:

1.18

XLC:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

LTL:

0.90

XLC:

1.15

Martin Ratio

LTL:

3.08

XLC:

4.31

Ulcer Index

LTL:

10.00%

XLC:

4.82%

Daily Std Dev

LTL:

38.62%

XLC:

19.35%

Max Drawdown

LTL:

-80.20%

XLC:

-46.65%

Current Drawdown

LTL:

-17.80%

XLC:

-7.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -3.39% return, which is significantly lower than XLC's 0.68% return.


LTL

YTD

-3.39%

1M

6.25%

6M

-2.95%

1Y

30.12%

5Y*

21.49%

10Y*

8.48%

XLC

YTD

0.68%

1M

3.67%

6M

1.60%

1Y

20.33%

5Y*

14.46%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LTL vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LTL vs. XLC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LTL is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LTL is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LTL is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LTL is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LTL is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LTL is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

XLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLC is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLC is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLC is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLC is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLC is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLC is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LTL vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the XLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTL and XLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LTL vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison

LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than XLC's 1.07% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
0.35%0.29%0.98%2.01%1.14%1.57%0.83%1.99%1.95%0.93%1.55%0.77%
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.07%0.99%0.82%1.11%0.74%0.68%0.81%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LTL vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, which is greater than XLC's maximum drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and XLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LTL vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...