LRNZ vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRNZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

LRNZ vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRNZ achieves a 23.78% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 49.84% return.

LRNZ

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 8.75%
• YTD: 23.78%
• 6M: 21.66%
• 1Y: 34.87%
• 3Y*: 23.92%
• 5Y*: 5.32%
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -4.72%
• 1M: -14.61%
• YTD: 49.84%
• 6M: 38.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRNZ vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	23.78%	1.09%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	49.84%	-38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LRNZ and MEME is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.50

LRNZ vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LRNZ	MEME
Technology	82.1%	66.7%
Healthcare	15.0%	5.4%
Communication Services	2.9%	5.5%
Basic Materials	-	4.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	4.8%
Financial Services	-	5.5%
Industrials	-	22.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	4.9%

Return for Risk

LRNZ vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRNZ

LRNZ Risk / Return Rank: 32
LRNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
LRNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
LRNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
LRNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
LRNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 26

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRNZ vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRNZ	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.15	—	—

Drawdowns

LRNZ vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, which is greater than MEME's maximum drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRNZ	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.33%	-48.78%	-12.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.87%	-21.27%	+13.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.48%	-28.59%	+2.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.09%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRNZ	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.55%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.44%	75.53%	-45.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.45%	75.53%	-38.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.68%	75.53%	-37.85%

LRNZ vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRNZ vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

Neither LRNZ nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRNZ and MEME in my portfolio?

LRNZ and MEME have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LRNZ or MEME?

On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRNZ or MEME?

LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRNZ or MEME?

LRNZ and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LRNZ and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.69% for MEME.