LRGF vs. GSIE

Last updated Jul 26, 2026

LRGF (iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF) and GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRGF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while GSIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LRGF returned 13.48%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for GSIE. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LRGF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSIE.

Performance

LRGF vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LRGF having a 8.94% return and GSIE slightly lower at 8.75%. Over the past 10 years, LRGF has outperformed GSIE with an annualized return of 13.48%, while GSIE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.

LRGF

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.20%
• 6M: 8.82%
• YTD: 8.94%
• 1Y: 15.34%
• 3Y*: 19.41%
• 5Y*: 13.20%
• 10Y*: 13.48%
• ALL TIME*: 12.23%

GSIE

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 1.03%
• 6M: 5.39%
• YTD: 8.75%
• 1Y: 17.13%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: 9.39%
• ALL TIME*: 8.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF	$16.98M	$19.56M	$19.60M
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF	$11.35M	$13.93M	$11.55M

LRGF vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF	8.94%	16.48%	26.59%	25.85%	-14.77%	25.01%	11.11%	26.11%	-9.66%	21.13%
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF	8.75%	32.53%	5.23%	16.99%	-15.86%	13.27%	7.45%	22.83%	-13.40%	26.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGF and GSIE is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015	0.76

The correlation between LRGF and GSIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

LRGF vs. GSIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LRGF	GSIE
Technology	37.3%	10.6%
Financial Services	11.7%	27.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	8.6%
Communication Services	10.0%	3.8%
Healthcare	9.4%	9.6%
Industrials	8.3%	18.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	7.5%
Energy	3.1%	4.2%
Utilities	2.0%	3.3%
Basic Materials	1.8%	5.4%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.2%

Return for Risk

LRGF vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGF

LRGF Risk / Return Rank: 52
LRGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
LRGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LRGF Omega Ratio Rank: 50
LRGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
LRGF Martin Ratio Rank: 59

GSIE

GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 48
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 47
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGF vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRGF	GSIE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.17	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.72	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.21	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	1.58	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.95	5.99	+0.96

LRGF vs. GSIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the GSIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGF and GSIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LRGF vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, roughly equal to the maximum GSIE drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and GSIE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGF	GSIE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.03%	-34.63%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-10.76%	+1.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.44%	-13.07%	-6.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.62%	-29.97%	+8.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.03%	-34.63%	-1.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	-1.06%	-1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.51%	-5.99%	+1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	2.84%	-0.56%

Volatility

LRGF vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) is 2.90%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that LRGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRGF	GSIE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	3.56%	-0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.83%	12.39%	-2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.69%	14.49%	-1.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.07%	16.08%	+0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.28%	16.49%	+1.79%

LRGF vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LRGF vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison

LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than GSIE's 2.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF	2.56%	2.65%	3.11%	2.87%	3.01%	2.40%	1.60%	2.80%	2.68%	2.31%	2.15%	0.13%
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF	1.09%	1.16%	1.23%	1.49%	1.78%	1.05%	1.35%	1.76%	3.27%	1.68%	1.56%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRGF and GSIE in my portfolio?

LRGF and GSIE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LRGF or GSIE?

GSIE has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to LRGF (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGF dropped -36.03% vs GSIE's -34.63%.

Which ETF is better, LRGF or GSIE?

On 10-year performance, LRGF leads with 13.48% vs 9.39% for GSIE. On fees, LRGF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, LRGF has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LRGF or GSIE?

Over the 10-year period, LRGF has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRGF or GSIE?

LRGF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRGF or GSIE?

GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.09% for LRGF.

What is the main difference between LRGF and GSIE?

LRGF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GSIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. LRGF tracks MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LRGF and 0.25% for GSIE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LRGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.