LRGF vs. FNDA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA).

LRGF and FNDA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LRGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor. It was launched on Apr 30, 2015. FNDA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both LRGF and FNDA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LRGF vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LRGF vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF	-4.69%	16.48%	26.59%	25.85%	-14.77%	25.01%	11.11%	26.11%	-9.66%	21.13%
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	3.11%	7.44%	9.00%	20.29%	-14.83%	31.12%	8.44%	24.34%	-12.12%	12.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGF achieves a -4.69% return, which is significantly lower than FNDA's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, LRGF has outperformed FNDA with an annualized return of 12.34%, while FNDA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.

LRGF

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -4.24%
• YTD: -4.69%
• 6M: -3.86%
• 1Y: 15.42%
• 3Y*: 18.34%
• 5Y*: 11.50%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

FNDA

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -5.58%
• YTD: 3.11%
• 6M: 4.77%
• 1Y: 19.91%
• 3Y*: 11.61%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGF vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

FNDA

Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF

LRGF

iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF

Return for Risk

LRGF vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGF

LRGF Risk / Return Rank: 54
LRGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
LRGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LRGF Omega Ratio Rank: 54
LRGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
LRGF Martin Ratio Rank: 62

FNDA

FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 56
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGF vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRGF	FNDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	0.91	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.41	-0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.19	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	1.40	-0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.87	5.33	+0.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LRGF vs. FNDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGF Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the FNDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGF and FNDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRGF	FNDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	0.91	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.30	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.45	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.45	+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between LRGF and FNDA is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LRGF vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than FNDA's 1.21% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF	1.23%	1.16%	1.23%	1.49%	1.78%	1.05%	1.35%	1.76%	3.27%	1.68%	1.56%	0.83%
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	1.21%	1.22%	1.53%	1.37%	1.38%	1.15%	1.31%	1.38%	1.64%	1.30%	1.18%	1.33%

Drawdowns

LRGF vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, smaller than the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and FNDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGF	FNDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.03%	-44.64%	+8.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.37%	-14.42%	+2.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.62%	-25.92%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.03%	-44.64%	+8.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.26%	-6.96%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.60%	-6.76%	+2.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	3.77%	-1.02%

Volatility

LRGF vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) is 5.21%, while Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that LRGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRGF	FNDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	6.37%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	12.74%	-3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.48%	22.04%	-3.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.05%	21.01%	-3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.30%	22.36%	-4.06%