PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LRGF vs. FNDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LRGFFNDA
YTD Return22.73%7.54%
1Y Return35.61%23.42%
3Y Return (Ann)10.82%3.24%
5Y Return (Ann)13.75%10.45%
Sharpe Ratio3.121.60
Sortino Ratio4.172.33
Omega Ratio1.581.28
Calmar Ratio4.611.92
Martin Ratio20.668.99
Ulcer Index1.92%3.36%
Daily Std Dev12.70%18.93%
Max Drawdown-36.03%-44.64%
Current Drawdown-2.44%-3.29%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between LRGF and FNDA is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

LRGF vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LRGF achieves a 22.73% return, which is significantly higher than FNDA's 7.54% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
180.23%
130.25%
LRGF
FNDA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LRGF vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
Expense ratio chart for FNDA: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for LRGF: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LRGF vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LRGF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LRGF, currently valued at 3.12, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LRGF, currently valued at 4.17, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LRGF, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.58
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LRGF, currently valued at 4.61, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.004.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LRGF, currently valued at 20.66, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0020.66
FNDA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 8.99, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.008.99

LRGF vs. FNDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGF Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is higher than the FNDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGF and FNDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.12
1.60
LRGF
FNDA

Dividends

LRGF vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than FNDA's 2.22% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LRGF
iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF
1.25%1.49%1.78%1.05%1.35%1.76%3.27%1.68%1.56%0.83%0.00%0.00%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
2.22%2.74%2.10%1.77%1.81%1.57%3.31%2.29%1.52%2.01%1.55%0.32%

Drawdowns

LRGF vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, smaller than the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and FNDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.44%
-3.29%
LRGF
FNDA

Volatility

LRGF vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) is 3.20%, while Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that LRGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.20%
3.95%
LRGF
FNDA