LRGF vs. QUAL
LRGF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF) and QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRGF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the STOXX U.S. Equity Factor Index, while QUAL is a Quality Factor fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LRGF returned 13.82%/yr vs 14.15%/yr for QUAL. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LRGF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUAL.
Performance
LRGF vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRGF achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than QUAL's 10.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LRGF having a 13.82% annualized return and QUAL not far ahead at 14.15%.
LRGF
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 1Y
- 19.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.32%
QUAL
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 1Y
- 21.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.71M | $10.50M | $11.75M | |
| $216.39M | $244.32M | $382.94M |
LRGF vs. QUAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 10.17% | 16.48% | 26.59% | 25.85% | -14.77% | 25.01% | 11.11% | 26.11% | -9.66% | 21.13% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 10.86% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 26.94% | 17.04% | 33.89% | -5.70% | 22.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRGF and QUAL is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015 | 0.92 |
The correlation between LRGF and QUAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
LRGF vs. QUAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LRGF
QUAL
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
LRGF
QUAL
Financial Services
LRGF
QUAL
Consumer Cyclical
LRGF
QUAL
Communication Services
LRGF
QUAL
Healthcare
LRGF
QUAL
Industrials
LRGF
QUAL
Consumer Defensive
LRGF
QUAL
Energy
LRGF
QUAL
Utilities
LRGF
QUAL
Basic Materials
LRGF
QUAL
Real Estate
LRGF
QUAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRGF vs. QUAL — Risk / Return Rank
LRGF
QUAL
LRGF vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF (LRGF) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRGF | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 2.25 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.67 | 10.08 | -2.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRGF vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than QUAL's maximum drawdown of -34.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and QUAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRGF | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.03% | -34.06% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -9.03% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -18.00% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.62% | -28.23% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | -34.06% | -1.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -0.61% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -4.07% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 2.01% | +0.28% |
Volatility
LRGF vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF (LRGF) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) at 2.88%. This indicates that LRGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRGF | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 2.88% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 9.72% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.89% | 12.33% | +0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 17.38% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 18.09% | +0.21% |
LRGF vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRGF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QUAL's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LRGF vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison
LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than QUAL's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 1.08% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.76% | 3.27% | 1.68% | 1.56% | 0.83% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.86% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, LRGF and QUAL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LRGF has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to QUAL (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGF dropped -36.03% vs QUAL's -34.06%.
On 10-year performance, QUAL leads with 14.15% vs 13.82% for LRGF. On fees, LRGF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 13.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LRGF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUAL.
LRGF has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.86% for QUAL.
LRGF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QUAL is Quality Factor. LRGF tracks STOXX U.S. Equity Factor Index, while QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for LRGF and 0.15% for QUAL.
QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRGF and QUAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer