PortfoliosLab logo
LRGF vs. INTF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LRGF and INTF is -0.80. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

LRGF vs. INTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

LRGF:

10.49%

INTF:

6.68%

Max Drawdown

LRGF:

-0.67%

INTF:

-0.70%

Current Drawdown

LRGF:

-0.25%

INTF:

-0.15%

Returns By Period


LRGF

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

INTF

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LRGF vs. INTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than INTF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LRGF vs. INTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LRGF is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LRGF is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LRGF is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LRGF is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LRGF is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LRGF is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

INTF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of INTF is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of INTF is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of INTF is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of INTF is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of INTF is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of INTF is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LRGF vs. INTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

LRGF vs. INTF - Dividend Comparison

LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than INTF's 3.11% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LRGF
iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF
1.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
3.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LRGF vs. INTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -0.67%, roughly equal to the maximum INTF drawdown of -0.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and INTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LRGF vs. INTF - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...