LNG vs. FANG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) and FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — LNG in Oil & Gas Midstream, FANG in Oil & Gas E&P. Over the past 10 years, LNG returned 21.91%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for FANG. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LNG vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 22.32% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 33.36% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed FANG with an annualized return of 21.91%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.

LNG

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 22.32%
• 6M: 18.42%
• 1Y: -1.71%
• 3Y*: 18.32%
• 5Y*: 22.98%
• 10Y*: 21.91%

FANG

• 1D: 2.89%
• 1M: 5.61%
• YTD: 33.36%
• 6M: 27.27%
• 1Y: 44.64%
• 3Y*: 18.70%
• 5Y*: 22.65%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNG vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	22.32%	-8.70%	27.18%	15.02%	49.30%	69.48%	-1.70%	3.18%	9.94%	29.95%
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.	33.36%	-5.64%	10.35%	19.66%	35.34%	127.51%	-46.00%	0.92%	-26.35%	24.93%

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and FANG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2012	0.47

Fundamentals

Market Cap LNG : $49.81B FANG : $56.05B
EPS LNG : $6.80 FANG : $1.40
PE Ratio LNG : 34.79 FANG : 141.45
PS Ratio LNG : 2.53 FANG : 3.75
PB Ratio LNG : 13.26 FANG : 1.54
Total Revenue (TTM) LNG : $20.28B FANG : $15.19B
Gross Profit (TTM) LNG : $5.52B FANG : $7.30B
EBITDA (TTM) LNG : $5.81B FANG : $5.54B

Return for Risk

LNG vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG

LNG Risk / Return Rank: 37
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 34
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 40

FANG

FANG Risk / Return Rank: 80
FANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FANG Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FANG Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNG vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LNG	FANG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	1.43	-1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	1.97	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.24	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	3.58	-3.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.15	7.07	-7.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LNG vs. FANG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the FANG Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and FANG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LNG	FANG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06	1.43	-1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.60	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.23	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.47	-0.31

Drawdowns

LNG vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than FANG's maximum drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and FANG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNG	FANG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.84%	-88.72%	-9.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.09%	-12.53%	-11.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.87%	-42.10%	+17.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.87%	-42.10%	+17.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.53%	-88.72%	+31.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.12%	-6.74%	-13.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.16%	-19.39%	-23.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.67%	6.33%	+5.34%

Volatility

LNG vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 7.91%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LNG	FANG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.91%	11.35%	-3.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.87%	23.88%	-2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.75%	31.51%	-3.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.28%	37.98%	-7.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.59%	49.06%	-16.47%

Dividends

LNG vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than FANG's 2.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.	2.09%	2.66%	5.06%	5.15%	6.55%	1.62%	3.10%	0.74%	0.40%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	0.92%	1.06%	0.84%	0.95%	0.92%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

LNG vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FANG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.

FANG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.

FANG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LNG and FANG in my portfolio?

LNG and FANG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LNG or FANG?

FANG has higher volatility (11.35%) compared to LNG (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs FANG's -88.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FANG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.