LINC vs. SIVR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LINC (Lincoln Educational Services Corporation) is a stock, while SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Over the past 10 years, LINC returned 40.74%/yr vs 15.87%/yr for SIVR. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LINC vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 109.52% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, LINC has outperformed SIVR with an annualized return of 40.74%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively lower 15.87% annualized return.

LINC

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 12.22%
• YTD: 109.52%
• 6M: 123.01%
• 1Y: 121.44%
• 3Y*: 96.20%
• 5Y*: 46.26%
• 10Y*: 40.74%

SIVR

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 29.45%
• 1Y: 114.25%
• 3Y*: 46.03%
• 5Y*: 21.28%
• 10Y*: 15.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINC vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation	109.52%	52.65%	57.57%	73.40%	-22.49%	14.92%	140.74%	-15.62%	58.42%	5.21%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	4.05%	145.34%	21.08%	-0.91%	2.59%	-12.33%	47.52%	15.17%	-8.96%	5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between LINC and SIVR is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2009	0.10

Return for Risk

LINC vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINC

LINC Risk / Return Rank: 90
LINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
LINC Omega Ratio Rank: 89
LINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
LINC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

SIVR

SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 51
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINC vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LINC	SIVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	1.95	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	2.11	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.36	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.47	2.71	+1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.28	5.80	+6.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LINC vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LINC Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINC and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LINC	SIVR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	1.95	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.06	0.59	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.50	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.32	-0.23

Drawdowns

LINC vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than SIVR's maximum drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and SIVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LINC	SIVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.11%	-75.85%	-23.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.35%	-42.42%	+15.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.35%	-42.42%	+15.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.96%	-42.42%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.51%	-42.42%	-15.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.73%	-36.52%	+33.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.11%	-47.85%	-11.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.92%	19.78%	-9.86%

Volatility

LINC vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) is 15.30%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.32%. This indicates that LINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LINC	SIVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.30%	16.32%	-1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.14%	58.30%	-27.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.61%	58.84%	-12.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.96%	36.17%	+7.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.05%	31.86%	+25.19%

Dividends

LINC vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

Neither LINC nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LINC and SIVR in my portfolio?

LINC and SIVR have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LINC or SIVR?

SIVR has higher volatility (16.32%) compared to LINC (15.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINC dropped -99.11% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.