SIVR vs. AGQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ).
SIVR and AGQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIVR is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). It was launched on Jul 24, 2009. AGQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Silver (-200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. Both SIVR and AGQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SIVR or AGQ.
Key characteristics
| SIVR | AGQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.40% | 24.92% |
| 1Y Return | 9.04% | 2.44% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.91% | -10.54% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.27% | 7.07% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.08% | -5.85% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.37 | 0.05 |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.05% | 50.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.85% | -98.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -45.95% | -95.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and AGQ is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SIVR vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly lower than AGQ's 24.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed AGQ with an annualized return of 3.08%, while AGQ has yielded a comparatively lower -5.85% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIVR vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SIVR vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SIVR vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor AGQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and AGQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SIVR vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is 9.69%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 19.41%. This indicates that SIVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.