SIVR vs. AGQ
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) are both Silver funds - SIVR tracks the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt) while AGQ tracks the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SIVR returned 12.91%/yr vs 5.67%/yr for AGQ. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AGQ.
Performance
SIVR vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -13.39% return, which is significantly higher than AGQ's -52.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed AGQ with an annualized return of 12.91%, while AGQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.67% annualized return.
SIVR
- 1D
- -5.41%
- 1M
- -18.43%
- YTD
- -13.39%
- 6M
- -13.95%
- 1Y
- 69.45%
- 3Y*
- 39.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
AGQ
- 1D
- -10.97%
- 1M
- -35.39%
- YTD
- -52.18%
- 6M
- -55.31%
- 1Y
- 54.32%
- 3Y*
- 41.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- 5.67%
SIVR vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -13.39% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -52.18% | 360.71% | 23.92% | -15.09% | -7.89% | -32.25% | 62.02% | 20.02% | -22.10% | 5.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and AGQ is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SIVR and AGQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
AGQ
SIVR vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 0.67 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 1.25 | +1.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and AGQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -98.16% | +22.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.16% | -81.48% | +34.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.16% | -81.48% | +34.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -81.48% | +34.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | -81.48% | +34.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.16% | -89.85% | +42.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -79.87% | +32.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.88% | 43.63% | -21.75% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is 14.32%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 29.28%. This indicates that SIVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.32% | 29.28% | -14.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.26% | 135.34% | -76.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.27% | 123.59% | -63.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.61% | 75.53% | -38.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.12% | 66.15% | -34.03% |
SIVR vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIVR vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor AGQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SIVR and AGQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AGQ has higher volatility (29.28%) compared to SIVR (14.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs AGQ's -98.16%.
On 10-year performance, SIVR leads with 12.91% vs 5.67% for AGQ. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SIVR has been the lower-risk option at 14.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.93% for AGQ.
SIVR and AGQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while AGQ tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). They also come from different issuers: abrdn and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.93% for AGQ.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and AGQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer